Great thread. Thanks. I'm currently in the market for my first drysuit. Will *mainly* be used in Yucatan cenotes, but some colder places as well. Going with DUI. Have been weighing pros and cons of FLX Extreme trilam vs. CF200 crushed neoprene.
Trilam vs. crushed neoprene drysuit
- Thread starter WillieJustice
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Trilam, while ostensibly longer-lasting, is obviously more costly and complicated to repair; and crushed neoprene can readably be mended with Aqua Seal and a pot of wetsuit cement -- and I am doing just that this weekend, no fuss no muss, while having a cup of coffee.
Having had both, I still prefer the neoprene -- warmer from the get go; cheaper; and who really cares if it takes longer to dry?
Also, I can use my neoprene drysuit with or without its undergarments -- and swimming is not like sporting a trilam garbage bag . . .
Having had both, I still prefer the neoprene -- warmer from the get go; cheaper; and who really cares if it takes longer to dry?
Also, I can use my neoprene drysuit with or without its undergarments -- and swimming is not like sporting a trilam garbage bag . . .
crushed neoprene are "tanks", but not for travel or perhaps warm waters unless you are in an abrasive environment.
the CF200 is a beast (or was back when DUI was good). I love my 200CFX...
Similar threads
