That's at odd with the recent US literature on inner ear DCS.
Maybe in the USA there is not a high rate of vestibular hits related to fast ascents, so there is not much about it in US literature. Most North American deep divers are likely to be more careful and specifically trained than many French deep divers IMO.
It is possible to see inner ear DCS in conjunction with other type 2 symptoms, but my understand of DCS when the major presenting complaint is only vestibular is that it was associated only with helium diving with a gas switch to nitrogen (and had been shows in a dry chamber to occur truly isobarically in a fully saturated diver, with no ascent and only a gas switch).
Yes what you describe do happen. Twenty years ago, Dr Jean-Louis Méliet took rabbits and brought them to
full saturation in Air at 4 ATA of N2 pressure (ppN2 = 4 ATA). Then he had them switch to Heliox 21/79 at the same pressure (isobaric switch). Then he analyzed the gas in the blood of the rabbits. He found that the sum of the partial pressures of the two inert gases after the switch (ppN2 + ppHE) was significantly more than 4 ATA for a significant amount of time. Of course, the switch from Air to Heliox is not realistic, and was probably done like this for financial reasons; one can expect less rise of ppN2 + ppHe in the other direction, yet there will still be a rise (this experiment is described in Dr Méliet's postface of Alain Foret recent translation in French of Haldane pioneer work on decompression).
But as I said such a switch is not the only possible cause of vestibular DCS hits.
Also, 15 minutes at 39m/130ft on 25/25 i would almost not consider a recreational triox dive, and I'd expect to see bad results from a direct blowup at those depths for that time.
I entirely agree.
Anyway for me "recreational" is quite meaningless, partly because even PADI tables have deco stops within their so-called NDL (e.g. for 20' on Air at 30 meters/100 feet which is the PADI NDL. PADI recreational table stipulates that the safety stop is mandatory then, which is the exact definition of a deco stop. Same rule for dives getting close to the NDL). As you wrote as well, and I agree, even "Rec" Trimix implies deco stops, but that shouldn't detract people. Most dives are actually deco dives.
I believe that "mild deco" (e.g. less than 15 minutes of total deco time on backgas) is a clearer and less confusing term than "recreational".
A reason for different appreciations among divers about the virtues of Helium for decompression (ascent rates put aside) may come from different usual bottom times. For my diving, typical bottom time on a square profile dive with Trimix 25/25 is around 20 to 25 minutes at 39 meters/130 feet, while I bet your bottom time might be much longer.
I'd also be careful with what your expert is talking about with "saturating dive" they may be talking about a dive to 1,000 ft and brought to saturation for a day, which you can't really extrapolate to the saturation of your very fast tissues after 15 minutes.
Yes that's what he was talking about (and that's what saturation diving is): a commercial diver brought to full saturation on Heliox at 10 ATA or more for days or weeks.
I don't extrapolate from that without a lot of care. But a decompression model or protocol that claims to be comprehensive has to predict adequate decompressions for this kind of diving as well. And IMO keeping this type of diving in a corner of one's mind gives useful insights.
What my expert (Dr Méliet) said was that, for this kind of diving, "Haldanian" ascent protocols (i.e. an ascent quite fast at the start to create a pressure gradient important enough for off-gassing) that were tried at first didn't work, and created lots of vestibular hits. I understand it as a hint that too fast ascents trigger vestibular hits as soon as a diver is saturated enough.
The ascent protocols for saturation diving now imply a very slow (a few feet per hour) ascent rate, that is constant by intervals, and getting progressively slower while approaching the surface. Apart from the rate itself, that's doesn't look very different from your "min deco" scheme (but as you recommend, I won't extrapolate).