He is very much associated with Undercurrent.I don't know if @John Bantin is associated with Undercurrent,
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
He is very much associated with Undercurrent.I don't know if @John Bantin is associated with Undercurrent,
(quote from the Undercurrent article)The content of their tanks are suspected of either being contaminated with CO or having a
too-rich oxygen mix, leading to toxicity at depth... It's more likely that the nitrox mix is suspect.
At 21m of depth, you get pO2=1.6 with nitrox 50%. There is lots of variability between individuals on oxygen toxicity resistance. You would probably need a higher pO2 to cause toxicity in a short time to two divers. I think it’s still more likely to have had a CO incident that 2 tanks with 70-80% O2.(quote from the Undercurrent article)
This is an interesting theory I don't think has been mentioned in this thread yet. This implies the nitrox mix of the tanks wasn't even tested. What percent oxygen would it have to be to cause oxygen toxicity after about 20 minutes??
Yes me too. Not only it is speculative, but also doesn’t make sense. Also, it is possible to have some tanks tainted but not others. CO contamination is most likely IMO.I am surprised--shocked, to be honest--by the level of speculation in the Undercurrent article.
Hello, John Bantin, you should know better than to publish this old myth...
As I mentioned earlier in this thread, the tanks may have been filled at different times, even different days, some while the compressor and filter were fine but two when the compressor was hot enough to burn its own oil or the filter clogged.It's unlikely CO poisoning was the culprit since that would have been due to a faulty compressor
installation and affected more tanks. All the other divers appeared to have no problems.
Thank you.Yes me too. Not only it is speculative, but also doesn’t make sense. Also, it is possible to have some tanks tainted but not others. CO contamination is most likely IMO.
Undercurrent article is self-promotion - no additional facts.