Three strikes and you're out... I've now written off PADI

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I'm actually quite pleased that - with one notable exception - the posting in this thread has been mostly fair and balanced, given they often descend into pure flame throwing. I believe very strongly in the PADI system, otherwise I wouldn't do it for a living, however I do fully recognise that the system is imperfect. I don't just mean the organisation itself, but the way its models are applied by the industry as a whole.

I know, and have trained personally, some excellent DMs and instructors who met the bare minimum number of dives - and I have met lousy divers, both recreational and professional, from a variety of agencies over the years.

The information is out there - and there are often many variations on the theme, but I've seen all too often how instructors preach something as mantra because it is how they were taught. Sometimes this is out-dated technique or practice - but they teach it because that's what they learned it back in the good old days so it *must* be true; maybe a hangover from another agency's training; often training that is no longer regarded as necessary.

Whatever form it takes, the net result is ignorance because perhaps the instructor or DM themselves put their faith in the training their own instructor gave them, without seeking to question. There is a wealth of information available, people just don't read it. The PADI Open Water manual is actually a good example of a book all-too-briefly flicked through and never actually read; there's a lot of good stuff in there.

The dive centre or resort promotes the three day course or the short instructor internship, not the agency. Yes, the agency must be regarded as complicit because they honour the certifications, but they do provide a very good structure for learning - with fairly rigid guidelines - and trust is placed in the instructor to fulfill their obligation to those standards. We all know it doesn't always happen like that, but you will find that in many places, regardless of agency, safe diving is taught very well indeed, even for a short resort course.

If I bought 3 Ford Cars and they all broke down, then I would think that - despite evidence to the contrary that Ford mass-produce reliable cars - 100% of mine failed me, so now I'm going to explore other options. Perhaps I will look at a more expensive and exclusive factory such as Ferrari - whose ability to produce cars that spontaneously break down is almost legendary.

So if somebody has been bitten and is thrice shy - so be it. Sorry you didn't get the training or the right safety briefing or whatever, and I think it's understandable to look for alternatives if you don't think you were getting what you wanted, although it has to be said that some people make the mistake of latching onto the training advice that they *wanted* to hear (not saying that is the case with the OP).

The instructor/DM/guide does make a lot of difference to a holiday for some people, and when you know a thing or two about diving you want the person in front of you to know something about what they are doing, where they are going, what they know, and - in some locations - have a tight bod and a tighter bikini. :D

Hopefully the OP will have his opinion reversed one day but in the meantime, good luck, and thanks to all... well, most ... for the generally civil and friendly debate.

Cheers :D

C.
 
Thanks Crowley, that was a great post.

I think my concern here is the fact that you're an established diver and your friends and family are going to look to you for advice. In that case, you may be inclined to just rip on PADI to the point that any aspiring new diver would avoid any PADI dive center no matter what. That's not a good thing, really. There are some very good PADI instructors and the advice should come at that level of granularity, not the entire agency.
If they wanted my opinion on which agency to obtain their certification through (and some have) then yes, I will recommend CMAS or NAUI and discourage them from opting for PADI. Apart from my concerns about some cavalier attitudes towards safety that I've seen in PADI circles, I also think they are over commercialising the sport of SCUBA diving and some of these "speciality" courses that they have just border on the ridiculous.

But that's just me. I know my experience is limited (very much so, I've only done 100 and odd dives) and I know that PADI as an agency might have excellent safety standards but, to use Crowley's example, if you've bought three Fords, all of which turned out to be lemons, would you recommend Ford to family and friends?
 
Thanks, that's useful to have. But I don't really think any of the above warrant an e-mail to PADI, except perhaps the second turd but then again, his irresponsible diving didn't affect me personally and he wasn't leading the dive.

Besides, I'm not PADI certified and their quality control is none of my business. I suppose I could take the time to let them know where their instructors are screwing up but why should I?

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
 
Apart from my concerns about some cavalier attitudes towards safety that I've seen in PADI circles, I also think they are over commercialising the sport of SCUBA diving and some of these "speciality" courses that they have just border on the ridiculous.

The more commercialized diving becomes, the more available it becomes. That is good for us all, as more locations, gear and innovations become available and accessible. The downside is more people on the boats.

As for all those specialty courses, if the student finds value in them, and feel they were worth the money, why not? I see zero value in abstract art, but I would not condemn any museum that displays it.

but, to use Crowley's example, if you've bought three Fords, all of which turned out to be lemons, would you recommend Ford to family and friends?

But you really haven't tried PADI, have you? Your certs are from CMAS, you haven't taken any PADI classes, all you have is a negative experience from 3 divers who have PADI in common. How many PADI divers have you been in the water with in your 100 and odd dives? How many have you not noticed because they were good divers and not butt heads?

If you want to write the agency off that is your choice. It seems to me that you don't have a real reason to do so, and I am not sure what your motives are for starting this thread in the first place. PADI hardly has a monopoly on bad attitudes...
 
If you want to write the agency off that is your choice. It seems to me that you don't have a real reason to do so, and I am not sure what your motives are for starting this thread in the first place. .

The motivation question really is interesting, isn't it? As just about everyone has pointed out, his original rant was based on some very flimsy experiences--why would he make start the threat, let alone give it the over the top title he did? And now he has changed the topic to make another anti-PADI statement for which he has even less rationale.

What's up? None of this is making sense. What are you trying to accomplish, and why?
 
When traveling I find that meeting DMs and instructors is sort of like playing a slot machine; you put another dollar in: sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. The certifying agency doesn't seem to matter.

You have to keep in mind that DMs and instructors do not necessarily have that much more knowledge than you, especially if they are not experienced in the many specialties that are offered by PADI. DMs and OW instructors are the last people I would consult on decompression theory and procedures or cave diving procedures, unless they at least hold those certifications. Given the relatively minimal amount of real diving experience that is required to meet the minimum DM or OW instructor certification requirements, and this applies to most certification agencies, there are going to be some pretty inexperienced people leading dives and teaching classes.

While I appreciate any information I can get from a dive briefing, I see no reason to debate with a DM or instructor over their stated procedures, especially in front of the entire group. Why? Because I'm going to follow my training and use my own judgement. A dive briefing is meant for the DM to provide relevant dive and safety information to the group, and not to lead a group discussion or debate the merits of various procedures and when they should be followed. It is always polite to listen to the briefing, smile, and nod in acknowledgement; then go out and do whatever you want within the limitations of YOUR training and local conditions.:D
 
It is always polite to listen to the briefing, smile, and nod in acknowledgement; then go out and do whatever you want within the limitations of YOUR training and local conditions.:D

While I agree with most of what you stated and even this to a degree, a good thing to keep in mind is that doing whatever you want within your training can have repercussions.

If another diver has an emergency and the DM has to recall the divers but you can't surface because you chose to do a deco dive since you were trained for it, it could be a problem. Also, if you break the limits set by the dive op, they may elect not to allow you to make the next dive.
 
Three strikes and you are out??? Does that mean that mean once I have met three A@@holes, I should write off humanity?

Maybe three trolls and I write off scubaboard??

No, any organization has their share of pricks.

I have trained with Padi, Naui and TDI. For me Padi is good at what it does. Padi is a great way to learn how to dive. It is practical and limited to what you need to dive safely within their limits.

Does a Padi OW student know the difference between a RGBM and the Buhlmann model. Heck no, naturally this would be outside the scope of the course. I have no idea whether the decompression model intricacies are in the DM or Instructor course content, but wouldn't see why it is relevant. Padi is good at compartmentalized learning allowing a gradual progression in skill and knowledge. I found Padi was good at telling me what to do, but less so at telling me why. There is a limit to what you will get from Padi and at some point to progress further self study (or other agencies) may be required. This is fine because Padi doesn't really target the 1% who do want to dig through the details of different decompression theories.

No doubt I represent my employer whether in the office, or in a bar after work. Similarly, when in a scuba environment, a DM or Instructor represents Padi. It is simply part of the qualification. Flagrant disregard for the standards reflects poorly on both the individual and Padi who they represent. Sadly there is no way to know in advance that someone is a poor ambassador for Padi and therefore all that could be done would be to weed them out afterwards.
 
Alright, thank you everyone for your participation. I'm a tad worried that this thread might have reached its expiry date and if it is kept on the shelve much longer it might go sour.

I take your points, you cannot hold PADI responsible for the actions of three individuals and I may have been exposed to some exemplary PADI divers and instructors, I just wouldn't have known. That said, I'm still not a fan of PADI and I reserve the right to that opinion (which isn't based just on these three cases, these were just the three that I chose to point out). I don't really have to explain myself but seeing as I've started the thread I felt that should explain myself to some extent. Now it will probably be better if we let it be. I know my opinion is flawed, for one, I know that I've learned a lot here on SB from divers, DM's and instructors who might be PADI certified for all I know.

Like Crowley said, the discussion has been very civil, despite the subject and original post being fairly provocative. Thanks to all for that.
 
While I agree with most of what you stated and even this to a degree, a good thing to keep in mind is that doing whatever you want within your training can have repercussions.

If another diver has an emergency and the DM has to recall the divers but you can't surface because you chose to do a deco dive since you were trained for it, it could be a problem. Also, if you break the limits set by the dive op, they may elect not to allow you to make the next dive.

I generally don't exceed recreational dive limits when I'm on a recreational dive, and am equipped as such. I prefer to reserve deco diving to planned events when I'm diving with doubles and have a cylinder of deco gas clipped to my harness or waiting for me in the appropriate place.

Beyond the obligatory checkout dive on some vacations, I haven't had a problem with unreasonable dive op restrictions.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom