dumpsterDiver
Banned
- Messages
- 9,003
- Reaction score
- 4,657
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
So you were dependent on another group of recreational divers to perform a critical function, but this was never explicitly discussed prior to a technical dive which was initiated in challenging and deteriorating conditions. It seems like a vulnerable position to put yourself and a student in.. depending on other team(s) to perform a critical function on a recreational (i,e,. non-professional) dive to technical depths.
Again, I have no technical training, but it would seem like, a technical dive instructor would have recognized that there are many potential reasons why the team who normally pulls (disconnects) the ascent line might fail to do so, reasons ranging from emergencies to confusion to failure to communicate a task clearly etc. and that a planned response to this contingency would be clearly discussed and prepared prior to the dive and sufficient smb's and reels/spools would be carried exactly for this contingency. These are the types of issues which I think are critically important on an ocean dive with current, not something which would be so important in a small lake or quarry.
So why would a contingency plan not been developed for this completely foreseeable potential problem? Of course i would think this would be a major component of the dive briefing (which was omitted). In addition, i am curious what benefit was derived by having your student and yourself remain on the line in a strong current getting beat up and separated from other divers from the boat? Once you were aware they left the line and started a drifting deco, why would you intentionally facilitate a separation in the divers that, based on your understanding of the current velocity and duration of deco, would necessarily cause a huge and dangerous separation of the divers.. literally scattering people over a one mile swath of rough ocean? Why not just let go and drift and stay together with other divers who made that decision?
I am curious to understand the thinking in this situation. maybe I am missing something, since I don't have technical dive training?
Again, I have no technical training, but it would seem like, a technical dive instructor would have recognized that there are many potential reasons why the team who normally pulls (disconnects) the ascent line might fail to do so, reasons ranging from emergencies to confusion to failure to communicate a task clearly etc. and that a planned response to this contingency would be clearly discussed and prepared prior to the dive and sufficient smb's and reels/spools would be carried exactly for this contingency. These are the types of issues which I think are critically important on an ocean dive with current, not something which would be so important in a small lake or quarry.
So why would a contingency plan not been developed for this completely foreseeable potential problem? Of course i would think this would be a major component of the dive briefing (which was omitted). In addition, i am curious what benefit was derived by having your student and yourself remain on the line in a strong current getting beat up and separated from other divers from the boat? Once you were aware they left the line and started a drifting deco, why would you intentionally facilitate a separation in the divers that, based on your understanding of the current velocity and duration of deco, would necessarily cause a huge and dangerous separation of the divers.. literally scattering people over a one mile swath of rough ocean? Why not just let go and drift and stay together with other divers who made that decision?
I am curious to understand the thinking in this situation. maybe I am missing something, since I don't have technical dive training?