lamont
Contributor
I don't know what you think the death toll is Pilot - but the confirmed death toll in Mexico from the swine flu as of yesterday was less than 10 ( I say less than 10 because I've heard 7 and I've heard 8). That IS NOT a staggering number. Of those deaths, it is also reported that they suffered from other underlying health issues as well. The flu complicated these existing health issues and/or due to their weakened immune systems, they were unable to fight off anything.
I'm not sure where your comparison with diving comes in there.
As has been posted by others already in this thread overnight, the WHO states that travel cancellations are unnecessary - but to take normal precautions.
Confirmed death toll is up to 16 now.
And obviously, 8-9 people didn't just die in the last 24h in mexico, but 8-9 of the suspected cases were confirmed, and there's a long lag time to due to the process of getting the cases laboratory confirmed.
The suspected deaths in Mexico now has been reduced from ~160 down to 101.
...
Also, with 162 confirmed cases in the US and no cytokine storming or dead adults, it is becoming pretty clear that this isn't a 1918-style flu epidemic. Still some precautions to keep the novel virus from spreading in vulnerable communities to give some time for a vaccine to be developed is prudent. There's still a window of about 6 months before a vaccine for this virus is developed and during which it can spread and kill in vulnerable commnities -- and that simply includes children. Go and explain to the parents of the 22-month old child who died in TX that this is just 'normal' influenza so they shouldn't feel bad about it.
There's a balance that needs to be struck between hysteria and practicality, but I have to say that I support some of the school closures around here in order to slow down the spread of the virus and give time for a vaccine to get developed. The kids in those school are most at risk of getting seriously ill, and if we send them home when one of the kids gets sick then we can slow it down, and reduce the numbers, which will reduce the numbers of deaths and give time to for a vaccine to get produced. The logic that becaue the flu normally kills 36,000 people a year that it doesn't matter at all is actually backwards -- because the flu normally kills 36,000 people a year that means that a lot of people are at risk, and if we do something to slow the spread of this virus before a vaccine is developed that means that we save a lot of people -- and only some of those people are the elderly who might just die a couple months later when whatever else they're sick with catches up with them -- some of them are just young children without fully formed immune systems...