Dan Gibson:
For the life of me, I still can't really figure out why it's really necessary since the instructor one gets for the upper level classes could easily get a recommendation from someone he or she trusts whether or not one is ready.
Dan,
As I understand it, as we continue to grow and experience changes, it is no longer practical to rely on the fact that you can just call the DIR-F instructor for a recomendation. When we were smaller and most every instructor knew everyone else, that system proved OK. Whereas today we've lost several instructors and we've added many others in various parts of the globe , so the ability to contact them and/or rely on their recomendation(s) is impractical. For example, I've had several people locally contact me about a Triox class and when I asked about their DIR-F pre-requisite they tell me that they've taken it from John Walker under the workshop format years ago. John hasn't taught for GUE in several years, nor at the time was he required to file any paperwork with HQ so it's unlikely I can get anything from him, or GUE in that regard. The simple fact is that along with growth and success comes the need to document the progress.
Moreover, at the time of the change in format, I happened to be in Florida with JJ and we spent a fair amount of time discussing the decision to change. The GUE Board of Directors felt that given the unprecedented, and frankly, unexpected success of the DIR-F class, that all too many divers initial experience with GUE had become the DIR-F class. In other words, the DIR-F class became the gateway to introduce DIR to the recreational market. As such, JJ felt that if they are going to use the DIR-F class as such a gateway then that vehicle needed to be more formalized, standards needed to be established and implemented, and lastly the workshop type format needed to comply more compatibly with exsisting GUE protocols, ie; no smoking, required gear, swim test etc. etc. etc. Under the workshop paradigm, nearly anything was allowed irrespective of how incompatible it was with DIR protocols. As you know, I did the vast majority of those early classes, and I can promise you that we saw every gear configuration imaginable ;-). The class has changed significantly since the early days, and frankly more students are better prepared for the first day of class then in the early days, so the gear modification portion of the class, which used to be a time consuming portion, is significantly reduced as time progressed. Moreover, the uniformity of class structure amongst the instructor core has resulted since the change towards certification based training. Again, in the early days it was much more of an ad hoc approach developed by tweaking this and that each and every week at the airport(s) ;-)
Anyway, that is my understanding of why GUE moved in that direction.
Hope that helps..
Regards,