is alive and well.
What's not doing so well is gouging people.
WalMart is doing quite well. So is Lowes. So is Home Depot. So is Target.
Anyone who thinks that a retail operation, mail order or otherwise, is surviving on 1-5% markups has had too may hits off the crack pipe.
LP, DiveInn and others are not selling at 1% or 5% over their cost. They're selling at a reasonably normal markup - 20% or more, I'd wager. LP, in particularly, DOES stock product and DOES have a real, honest-to-God storefront. With that come REAL costs. To argue that these guys are all "internet retailers" and thus avoid those real costs and taxes is false Rick, particularly in the case of LP, which is where most of the bullets are aimed by the LDS community.
The LDS is selling at 40-60% or more above LP's retail price. You can't use LP as a "cost" number, since they obviously wouldn't be in business for long if they were selling at cost; they have expenses too. And NY, by the way, has one of the highest imputed cost structures (in the form of taxes and such) for businesses anywhere in the United States.
There are a number of tax structures that states often employ that are abominations and offensive to ordinary sensibilities. Property tax on inventory is one of those (punishing retailers for keeping stock for consumers to buy?!), but by no means the only one.
Yes, there are costs on doing business. So what?
Big-box retailers are able to amortize some of those costs over more product sold than small-box retailers. This is a surprise? No, it should not be. But is the difference as enormous as some in the dive industry try to make it sound? No, its not.
I was a "small box" retailer, and a service seller, for more than a decade. We could not and did not try to compete with the PC Connections and the CDWs of the world on hardware. We sold solutions to problems, not just products - at least most of the time. We found a way not only to stay in business, but to prosper doing so. And not once did I pull some kind of garbage on someone about how we "couldn't" sell below some price due to a dealer agreement - I never entered into one, although I had people try. If necessary I sourced product around "authorized" channels - it almost never WAS necessary though. To the extent that manufacturers and competitors truly did things that were anticompetitive, and harmful to the consumer's interest, I exposed them - in public. It was surprising how fast people would backpedal from supposedly "iron clad" positions when faced with such a thing, and how many SALES I got from consumers who, once informed, were quite happy to find a vendor who was interested in BOTH the buyer and seller having their best interest served. I was extremely aggressive about sourcing my product and what I paid for it. Nonetheless, we often lost sales on hardware to mail order houses. I didn't care - we made a fair profit on everything we sold, and didn't try to cross-subsidize one line with another - so if you wanted to buy part of a total package elsewhere, that was no skin off my nose, and I had no reason to be "offended."
Part of the problem here appears to be that shops have, instead of being aggressive about sourcing product and thereby not needing to play the cross-subsidy game, instead RELY on it to stay open. Mike has documented some of these, such as a shop that can't discount hardware more than 10% but will throw in a "free" class - or nearly "free" - thereby cross-subsidizing the hardware and debasing the value of training in the entire local area - including HIS! That creates all kinds of distortions in the marketplace and makes for a lot of ill will when someone doesn't play along with your predetermined plan.
If your training class at $200 contains an implicit $200 subsidy from equipment sales, the guy who buys the hardware from LP might cause you to take a LOSS on the class you sell him! But who's fault is that? Its YOURS (the dive shop owners), because you designed a system that was unbundled and yet contained implicit cross-subsidies. At least Mike's competitor is HONEST about it, in that HIS cross-subsidy is clearly visible (buy $1,000 in MSRP of hardware, get a $500 class for $200, thereby effectively getting a 30% discount on the gear.)
An intelligent consumer SHOULD figure this out and SHOULD cherry-pick - you gave them EVERY opportunity to do so, now you gripe and whine when they do the intelligent thing?
Its time for the LDS folks to get off their high horses. Get rid of the cross-subsidies, start being aggressive about sourcing your product and its cost, and sell at a fair mark-up. If you do that then you will be within 10-15% of the LPs and DiveInns on price, and you'll find that suddenly the argument about "local service" actually DOES have some value.
I'll gladly pay an extra $50-75 on a $500 purchase to buy locally and support a local shop, especially if they have a good attitude to go along with it.
I will NOT pay an extra $400, and neither will anyone else once they find out that you can save that $400. The shop's current attempts to discredit the internet vendors with lies and attempted punishment of consumers who buy there just adds insult to the equation and drives people away.