Bill Walton
Contributor
I wanted to hear a little discussion on appropriete tank size for doubles. I know this is a function of gas consumption and desired range. I have an average to above average sac rate and will be using the set for deco procedures and extended range class, maybe later cavern/cave class. As far as non-class fun, they will be occationally taken x-country to Florida and NC for wreck diving. Here locally where I dive there is a pretty good uphill (both ways it seems) walk from the dive site so weight is somewhat of a consideration. I want steel tanks. I am currently diving wet but will add a drysuit soon and have to wear around 15lbs of lead with a 5mm and single steel (oms 112) tank so do not want to have to add more weight. As it is, if I went in with no lead and steel doubles diving wet, I would not have much negative bouyancy to swim up even with full tanks. Now, in reality, after adding in staging bottles and light, the load gets heavier but I am not at that point yet and will be diving dry by then.
Right now I am on the fence between PST lp80's or 104's and OMS 112's and 85's. I like the 26" tanks (i.e pst 104, oms 112 and 85's) and the lighter weight of the OMS but like the durable finish of the PST. For lighter weight the PST 80's look good, but they are shorter than I might like. The 85's seem good with 179cuft of gas and a light, nimble package in comparison to the pst 104's (30lbs lighter), but for the diving/classes I want to do, is 170 cuft sufficient or just a minimum. Would I be better off going with a larger volume.
Oh the considerations to ponder.
Thanks all.
Bill
Right now I am on the fence between PST lp80's or 104's and OMS 112's and 85's. I like the 26" tanks (i.e pst 104, oms 112 and 85's) and the lighter weight of the OMS but like the durable finish of the PST. For lighter weight the PST 80's look good, but they are shorter than I might like. The 85's seem good with 179cuft of gas and a light, nimble package in comparison to the pst 104's (30lbs lighter), but for the diving/classes I want to do, is 170 cuft sufficient or just a minimum. Would I be better off going with a larger volume.
Oh the considerations to ponder.
Thanks all.
Bill