- Messages
- 22,171
- Reaction score
- 2,802
- # of dives
- 5000 - ∞
Someone who insists on teaching himself may find that he has a fool for a student.IMO anyone that thinks they need a solo diving course to be ready to solo dive, isn't ready to solo dive. Solo diving is about self-reliance after all.
Exactly.Which is fine...if we were talking about how people conduct their dives. The primary debate here however, is how an agency formulates and conducts its training courses.
Gee ... sounds like you've got a lot of experience writing standards.Let me help you out. A bunch of people got really drunk, wrote down a lot of crap. Half that crap made it to the standards, was approved by people with hangovers, and the motion was carried. A certification standard is only a standard to those who subscribe to it. Get it?
They do not have to defend themselves, they wrote the standard. They will change the standard as it suits them. Debating this is crazy. If you need the "standard" to feel safe diving solo, maybe you should not be diving solo.
Eric
I was hoping for a gem of wisdom from the SDI rule that I was unfamiliar with. For caves the rule of thirds makes sense (as a starting point), but for solo, I still can't see it. I have no problem with people deciding to carry whatever level of reserve and redundancy they need to feel comfortable, I just operate on the basic premise that less is more, except when it's too little ... and I was hoping for an insight into what "too little" means....
Unlike the Solo training manual, I really don't see a lot of qualifications and wiggle room here! Given this kind of language, my takeaway from the Cavern cert training - in contrast to the Solo cert training - is that the Rule of Thirds is an absolute starting point, the only deviation should be in situations where you would plan even more conservatively!
Me too.Ok, thanks for the clarification - your side of the debate is clearer now.
It seems that the Solo course is a lot more vague than tech/wreck/cave courses. I always assumed that solo training would have an equally rigid doctine.
No, not at all. We were looking for a reasoned judgment for applying the rule of thirds to solo diving, in the hopes of finding a truism that we could expand upon. We were disappointed when we did not.First you're unhappy that they're enforcing rule of thirds for no good reason, now you're unhappy that they're not?
For me, best practice is to always dive with a buddy who is also a team member. I try very hard to never subject myself to a ppO2 that exceeds 2.8ATA.Perhaps more people should read the SDI Solo Diving Manual before they pass judgement. I, for one, found it well written in presenting good information, thought processes, and stressing on safety and responsibility for oneself. There was nothing that said, "thou shalt", "mandatory", or anything along those lines.
Instead, it says things like, "A properly equipped solo diver will wear the following: . . . ", ". . . one . . . thing to consider with regard to . . .", " . . . a good dive plan includes . . ."
The manual describes SDI's best practices. It is up to the diver (you know, that person that is responsible for him or herself), to take away what is important to this course.
Now, to pass the final cert dive, you do have to do a dive plan that includes you hitting the boat with one third of your gas, within the time allotted, shooting your SMB, etc . . . You have to show an understanding of what the course teaches. It doesn't come away with any "if you don't do this, you will die". [side note: My PADI nitrox instructor taught that if you break your MOD, you will die . . .]
