Split Fins in Reverse

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Nice report Uncle Pug ... and fairly representative of my experiences, although I'm coming at it from the "other" end. One observation is that the decreased efficiency is to some degree related to the fact that you're much more used to one fin than the other.

I put about 660 dives on my Biofins before getting my Turtles about a month ago. The first few dives with the Turtles were not pretty ... they required a totally different technique to scull than the Apollo's did and it took me a few dives to figure it out. After about 40 dives with the Turtles I felt totally comfortable with them ... then I switched back to the Biofins for a more effective comparison. What I found is that I like both fins for completely different reasons.

As you note, the Turtles are a finesse fin ... they're much more maneuverable than the Biofins. And they have much more "glide" when sculling than the Bio's do. Although I always felt that my frog kick and heli kick were better than average in the Bio's, they're much better and easier in the Turtles. There's a difference in how you produce the kick in each fin, however. The Bio's require more use of your legs and knees, whereas the Turtles really don't like that motion, and are far more effective if you keep your knees quiet and use your ankles more to move the fins.

But when swimming againsty current, the Turtles are appropriately named ... they're not a fast fin. Diving Titlow (in the Tacoma Narrows) last week was much easier in the Bio's, as we had quite a bit of current to contend with. Of course, in current I prefer using a flutter kick for a constant power stroke ... a scull is a gliding kick, and gliding just isn't efficient when you're swimming "upstream" ... and a flutter kick is what splits do best. Also, for long touring dives ... like at the local underwater park, where one can cover lots of territory in an hour ... the Bio's are preferable simply because their reduced resistance makes for less leg fatigue over the course of a long dive.

To those who make claims about what you can't do with splits, or say that they make you silt up the bottom I say "nonsense" ... it's the diver, not the fin, who determines what you can and can't do. I've a friend who dives a cheap, plastic pair of USeless Diver fins ... and he amazes me with what he can do in them.

Oh, and Uncle Pug ... would love to head out for a couple of dives and work on that reverse kick with ya. I'm still having trouble making it work right ... with either fin ... ;)

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
UP,

There was a US Navy and Navy Experimental Diving Unit sponsored study in the UHM Journal this year that is one of the most exhaustive fin studies I have seen. In it they tested they Jets, Quattros, and Apollos. Interestingly they also took a pair of Apollos and taped the split shut and tested these against the regular Apollos and other fins.

While only the flutter kick was used for testing by taping the split shut this improved the oxygen consumption as a function of velocity of the splits considerably. The Jets had the lowest consumption at the the highest swim velocity (2.536 L/min) but by taping the Apollo split the O2 consumption dropped from 2.728 to 2.596 L/min making the taped version the second most efficient.

What would be an interesting experiment would be to compare the taped Apollos to the Jets when attempting the alternative kicks. My only complaint about my Jets is the foot box is too rigid and doesn't fit very well so I'd be curious to try the taped Apollos as they have a nice soft fitting foot pocket.

UP thanks for the above report but it would be interesting to compare the taped Apollos to the Jets with those alternative fin kicks.
 
pufferfish once bubbled...
What would be an interesting experiment would be to compare the taped Apollos to the Jets when attempting the alternative kicks. My only complaint about my Jets is the foot box is too rigid and doesn't fit very well so I'd be curious to try the taped Apollos as they have a nice soft fitting foot pocket.
Puffer, on the very first test dive I had planned to put duct tape on the splits and then remove it half way through the dive to see what the difference would be.

But I locked the duct tape in the truck and didn't want to go back and get it. :D

Actually I am glad that I didn't because doing the whole dive with the splits (several dives with them total) I was able to compare SAC over identical dives.

I do plan on taping the splits and will post my results here.

As for foot *box* issues with the Jets... have you ever tried the Turtle fins? They have a much large foot pocket.
 
I'm not sure that split v non-split is what is being measured here.

The Apollo is a VERY soft fin. I tried it and hated it but I now use the Atomic Aquatic splitfin and really like it. It's stiffness is much more comparable to my old Avantis.

My gut feeling is that if these 'tests' were conducted on fins of relatively equal stiffness the picture would be quite different.

UP, in the spirit of balanced assesment that you have embarked upon, you might just want to just try a pair of Atomics before drawing any final conclusions. They are completely different to the Apollos.

Just a thought.

EDIT: Before testing them I was totally cynical about splits and was very suprised with my own (less rigerous) results.
 
Grajan once bubbled...
UP, in the spirit of balanced assesment that you have embarked upon, you might just want to just try a pair of Atomics before drawing any final conclusions.
... send them to me. It cost Mike Ferrara $17.50 to ship the Apollo Bio-Fins to me but there is really no need to 2nd day the Atomics... UPS ground will be fine.
 
Uncle Pug once bubbled...

... send them to me. It cost Mike Ferrara $17.50 to ship the Apollo Bio-Fins to me but there is really no need to 2nd day the Atomics... UPS ground will be fine.

Ouch! That's more than the fins are worth (to me).
 
MikeFerrara once bubbled...
Ouch! That's more than the fins are worth (to me).
... but evidently Sandy wanted to see them fly away in a hurry. :D

Don't worry though, I couldn't let you eat that... I reimbursed her (she did tell you didn't she?)
 
MikeFerrara once bubbled...


Ouch! That's more than the fins are worth (to me).


So you pretty much just paid someone to take em off your hands.

Got any other stuff you wanna get rid of?

Doubles?

Compressors?

Fill station?

Awww hell, I'll even be generous and split the cost of shipping with you! ;)
 

Back
Top Bottom