Finally!!!OK. We can put period debate thingy to rest then.
I was about to hit the unwatch.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Finally!!!OK. We can put period debate thingy to rest then.
This is what I love most about the quality of internet "investigations" into, specifically, diving accidents:
1. Extensive discussion here (and I've only skimmed the posts) about a connection between shark feeding and the attack even though there's not been any documentation (at least none that I've seen) about shark feeding going on anywhere nearby the attack site.
Shark behavior video. The bit about sensing blood and reactions to human blood starts at about 11:15
Stuart's cove is around 20 miles away from Rose Island, not 100.Let’s apply Occam’s razor, and ask what’s the more likely explanation for this shark incident: (1) that the victim was menstruating, (2) that there is a shark feeding dive operation over a hundred miles away, or (3) that the victim was snorkeling with PIGS?
Seriously.How about we drop menstruation from the discussion. 1. It is an old wive’s tale from fifty years ago that has long been debunked. 2. We are talking about a girl who died in terrible manner. Let’s show some respect.
Do they count the pigs? And even if couple pigs were missing will anyone report this in the news?It's interesting I couldn't find an article on any pigs being eaten.