What's it cost? As far as I'm concerned, if it has a five-digit cost, it's worthless for widespread use. Modest cost means practicality for the common cave diver, and something that will actually amount to more than a one-off cave mapping before a white paper is written and the entire operation left to collect dust. Maybe that's a harsh opinion, but it's one set in reality.
The most current pipeline runs only on a single gopro9 or on a pair of gopro9s. Check
this link in case you missed it.
As cool as Sunfish is (and just to be clear, I don't mean this personally or to single them out), I don't see more than what, 700ft of peacock from them? I'm hoping that there is a combination of tech out there that lets anyone say "maybe I won't buy a rebreather this year" and instead map a couple cave systems local to them. Doesn't have to be accurate to a centimeter (that's a hyperbole), just enough to navigate reasonably. Just my 2 cents.
Only hardware issues are stopping as at the moment from dropping our robots in the cave. SLAM works and navigation also. I can personally guarantee the second one as the main developer of the navigation stack and enough experiments with the robot navigating safely in extremely confined environments. I am confident we can do better with a completely untethered robot in the very near future. I don't have access to the technology of Sunfish, but from few demos I have seen I speculate that they are using a bit more old-school approach that face some challenges we are able to resolve. I am doxing a bit myself but
this is 4-5 years old work. You can see safe navigation in both known and unknown environments, inside simulated shipwrecks, etc. Real demonstrations were more limited due to issues with SLAM (lack of texture, features, etc) and hardware issues we faced (motherboard getting fried twice) before we run more interesting experiments. Assuming SLAM working, the average cave seems an easier environment to explore.
I believe strongly that the technology is there, it's mostly a matter of time and money. The problem is that yet there is no enough profit from people interested to map caves instead of buying RB. And especially when the primary sector driving the market is oil/gas and defense, well... they have enough money to waste. You think Sunfish (?$) or our robot... Aqua2 (150K$+) are expensive platforms? The robot I am working right now costs 22M$... If for some reason that becomes a priority, well BlueROV runs at 12K$ lets add some cheap sensors etc it can go up top 15K and give your price for the software which could be anything from 0$ if it's opensource to $$$$. It can happen. It's just that no company would survive raising those money in Shark Tank...
View attachment 775707
Open Source TOF Lidar. Contribute to iliasam/OpenTOFLidar development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Some of the components are more expensive now, but this is the acquisitions list. Not at all saying it'll produce professional results down to the millimeter, but hey, this guy has something you can build for in the neighborhood of 200 bucks for above water use. Switch out the laser for something blue, maybe add a narrow band filter, and it will probably work.
Robots are not simple systems, and I would say that every second of their existence "defies" the probabilities. The problem is not only on the single sensor, actuator, etc. It's also (if not mostly) on how these are combined and how they rise the complexity of the entire system. Many many many things can go wrong and if somebody would like to guarantee performance, especially in remote underwater cluttered environments, you need the best of the best of the best solutions which costs. I am in the DIY forum advocating a bit "against" of DIY, but I think what we are discussing is well above the average complexity of the other topics.