My sympathy goes out to the family of the diver as well as the crew on the boat. I have read alot about this accident on the net aswell as some of the posts, some of the stuff I have read online aswell things I have heard on the news bother me. Why is it that when ever their is an accident,the public aswell as the media feel that someone needs to be singled out and blamed, the dive charter for example. Their name is being dragged through the mud for no reason. Diving can be dangerous no matter where it is. Many divers aswell as non divers have the desire to get into the water with sharks. Some people desire diving with larger sharks, tiger sharks, lemon sharks, hammerhead sharks ,bull sharks,and even great white sharks. This is not anything new and is not likely to go away because of one diver being bit by a shark. The fact is the diver had a desire to dive with these sharks without the protection of a cage. I dont for one second feel he was put on the boat against his will, geared up, and thrown into the water with these sharks. He likely did his homework and chose the dive charter in question because they claimed they could get him up close and personal with these sharks. Regardless if they were chumming the water or not, diving in a cage, or out of a cage, The fact remains that what ever the circumstances are, when you get into the water knowing that sharks are in the area, guess what people, YOU MIGHT GET BIT. The diver knew their would be sharks, he knew their would be chum in the water, he knew he wouldnt be in a cage, and guess what, he still got into the water. I feel it is extremely risky and dangerous to dive with these sharks with out a cage, but that is just me. This is not the fault of the boat crew, the dive shop, they can not control or predict what a shark might do. As far as im concerned, The shark is to blame for biting the diver and the diver is to blame for getting into the water with known aggressive sharks without the protection of a cage. We all make choices in our lives, perhaps we should take responsability for our own actions instead of looking for someone to blame when things dont go as planned. I would personally love to dive with lemon sharks, tiger sharks, bullsharks, hammerheads, aswell as greatwhites, however I would never risk my life just to say I swam with these sharks without the security of a cage.Regarding percentages of attacks on divers, here are some stats from ISAF.
Surfers/windsurfers (35 incidents: 56% of cases with victim activity information) and swimmers/waders (24: 38%) and were the recreational user groups most often involved in shark attacks in 2007. Less affected were divers/snorkelers (4: 6%). In eight attacks the activity of the victim was not ascertained. Surfers have been the most affected user group in recent years.Getting species identification in shark attacks is difficult because victims seldom see the shark or, if they do, see it in sufficient detail to make an accurate identification (often difficult even for well-trained scientists). Therefore we get this information in only a small portion of our investigations. In 2007, we identified the attacking shark to species in a dozen incidents: white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (5), tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier (3), bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas (2), and bronze whaler, Carcharhinus brachyurus (2). In addition, one bite was attributed to an unidentified species of wobbegong and two bites were said to be "blacktip" sharks, a somewhat dubious identification inasmuch as many shark species have black tips on their fins.