diveanytime
Contributor
I'm not in favor of creating laws that goes against my right to view sharks in the ocean 3 miles out.
I'm in favor of changing the laws to NO CHUM against the fishermen who blatenly bait their nets and traps all along our coastline (within the 3mile limit). We aren't in the dark ages of technology so using the excuse of doing it the Hawaiian way for culture is dumb at best since it creates the issues of safety for those who use the shoreline (not 3 miles out).
Since our tourist economy has been hurt by the recession, why ban shark touring if it's what the public wants? To me it's just shooting ourselves in the foot to tell the public to go somewhere else to take their vacations. Mind you, I'm OK with the 3 mile limit opertion and NO chumming even there. Don't need it, since the sharks are there to begin with.
I'm in favor of changing the laws to NO CHUM against the fishermen who blatenly bait their nets and traps all along our coastline (within the 3mile limit). We aren't in the dark ages of technology so using the excuse of doing it the Hawaiian way for culture is dumb at best since it creates the issues of safety for those who use the shoreline (not 3 miles out).
Since our tourist economy has been hurt by the recession, why ban shark touring if it's what the public wants? To me it's just shooting ourselves in the foot to tell the public to go somewhere else to take their vacations. Mind you, I'm OK with the 3 mile limit opertion and NO chumming even there. Don't need it, since the sharks are there to begin with.