Semi-DIY O2 and CO analyzer

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I'm convinced of the benefit of analyzing tanks for O2 percentage and presence of CO (carbon monoxide).

I was a kickstarter supporter of Cootwo, and still think it was a great concept and form factor. I was unhappy with the lack (and tone) of support from Divenav in the past. On my last dive trip I found that my Cootwo was giving really wonky readings (O2 randomly off by 5~10%, despite having a good sensor, recent calibration, etc) and the CO sensor was due for replacement/calibration. With Divenav out of business (or at least, out of the business of hardware products -- maybe they still have a presence with their apps), I began looking for alternatives.

I decided to use off-the-shelf O2 and CO devices, packaging them to use the same gas supply in order to simultaneously analyze for both gases. There are a couple of great threads on true DIY builds for an analyzer ( Nitrox/Trimix & CO analyzer and DIY Touch Screen Trimix Analyser), and either of those would probably be a better solution than my hack, but that's never stopped me before from building my own Frankenstein.

My solution was to add a way to reduce the gas pressure and flow. Here's the finished product, which I'm calling Frankenstein Ugly Carbon-monoxide Kit & Oxygen Reader, but I may need to change the acronym for marketing purposes:
The Frankenstein Ugly Carbon-monoxide Kit & Oxygen Reader has now evolved to MarkII, with the Forensics Detector CO sensor and nicer packaging inside an old mask box. I chose the Carbon Monoxide Super-Meter model because it reads at 0.1PPM -- not that I'm concerned about the significant digits, but because I want a detector that will be (more) accurate <10PPM, which is about the initial trigger for many (lower cost) models meant for industrial/environmental use.

20250128_205141.jpg

20250128_205210.jpg

20250128_205330.jpg
 

Back
Top Bottom