ekremer
Contributor
I beleive I stated earlier, but I could be wrong. I do not like whaling and I do not condone what the Japanese are doing.
However, I also do not beleive 2 wrongs make a right. I do not beleive the sea shepherds have a right to assault the whalers just because their views fit mine. I beleive that it is up to the nation whos waters they are in to remedy the situation if they care to. I beleive its up to the UN and the IWC and their members to enforce the treaties.
and since the IWC is condeming the shepherds I tend to beleive that they don't like their tactics either, or the Japanese are working legally.
I beleive the rights of the whalers should be protected, and their lives (including their health) and their property be protected just like anyone elses.
In the end I would like to see the UN actually do something for once and flex their muscle to force the ship to return home, but from it sounds like the Japanese are working inside a legal loophole so they can't be arrested.
However, I also do not beleive 2 wrongs make a right. I do not beleive the sea shepherds have a right to assault the whalers just because their views fit mine. I beleive that it is up to the nation whos waters they are in to remedy the situation if they care to. I beleive its up to the UN and the IWC and their members to enforce the treaties.
and since the IWC is condeming the shepherds I tend to beleive that they don't like their tactics either, or the Japanese are working legally.
I beleive the rights of the whalers should be protected, and their lives (including their health) and their property be protected just like anyone elses.
In the end I would like to see the UN actually do something for once and flex their muscle to force the ship to return home, but from it sounds like the Japanese are working inside a legal loophole so they can't be arrested.