How many times have you had to actually rescue somebody with your BC?
For a weightless no drag rig try a Luxfer 50 or even the 63. It is like there is nothing there and because your so unencumbered and drag free your air consumption is low, the 50 does just great for a nice long dive in shallower water. A SeaHunt harness or the somewhat updated "travel " version made by Simonbeans to use an aluminum 80 for tropical travel is super minimal and the ultimate in traditional harness. There is no back pack or plate, just a simple harness. While they appear uncomfortable once adjusted they are just the opposite,totally minimal and pure freedom.
I have no weight belt on, I am slightly heavy to begin the dive and slightly light at the end, well within the ability to control with my built in BC, my lungs:
I am diving this vintage SnugPack with steel 72 above:
Traditional harness on Mike Nelson:
Travel harness, can adapt to steel 72, aluminum 63 or 80 etc. :
Packs real light, no BC, no plate, no weight belt needed, nothing, can carry your kit in your pocket almost. All you need add is a regulator and a mask and fin set. No worries for being over carry on weight here.
I bought this book and really love it, this lady has a nice harness but it is not adjusted or run correctly but her triple tank set is to die for. Shorty suits like hers were a common way to dive before there were BCs or often just wore the top like this fellow:
The minimal exposure suits limited bouyancy swing with suit compression and as has been mentioned, suits in the era were denser and did not compress as much. Today Rubatex is still the finest material for a quality suit, denser, heavier and less compression with depth reducing bouyancy swing. Notice his haphazard addition of a single weight--lol--I bet he was doing some adjusting to compensate for the jacket top, very authentic.
Good luck.
N