While I have heard of The 25 not being happy in cold water I have not been witness to any such problems, from mine, or any other diver I know that uses one. More than 90% of my diving being in the northeast and offten in the winter. But then again I was told that my MK VII was a failure waiting to happen in cold water, Yet has been right behind me on ice dives done since buying it in the 80's. Both have been rock solid performers in water much colder than 40 f. Not having been formally trained on the engineering and theory of regulators I must admit ignorance, but how is it that I have not had a single problem or failure with the same gear constantly named as being trouble?
This is not meant to be accusatory or sarcastic, it's a genuine query that has puzzled me for years. I have over time, been through a fair string of trial and error before
finding a line that suits me, and that I have grown to trust. Oddly enough it seems to be named as a "not so good choice" Despite cold, depth, heavy silting and hard work.
Could it be just a matter of brand prefferance? or am I just the luckiest SOB in the world? I understand that DA Aquamaster is the local authority on SP and would love to hear your insight on this. While I am aware of the short commings of some entry level gear, this is not what I question. How much is backed up fact, and how much is fiction? I wonder, and would like to hear from a source more informed on this than I am.