stormrider
Contributor
ddavid:Warmwaterdiver: hmm interesting to note there are different kinds of Buhlmann algorithms around.. can't just read the specs on a divecomp showing the "B" word and take it to mean its the same across the board.
Stormrider: So which model u're leaning towards now? I love Uwatecs (i dive with an aladin prime) but for some reason i won't give the Xtender my vote at the moment.. the Nemo is nice but just too expensive over here, that leaves the Stinger; essentially almost a Mosquito but with a flashier metal casing.. If only Uwatec would make their own version of a wristwatch style divecomp, i.e. one tht's not manufactured by Seiko, but rather fully manufactured by Uwatec, perhaps same specs as Aladin Prime, but in a smaller less hockey-puck like casing.. that would solve ur buying decision![]()
Yes, there are probably variations to the Buhlmann algorithm. Just as there are probably variations to Suunto's RGBM algorithm (that's because I noticed the Suunto D9 uses "Deep Stop RGBM" instead of just "plain" RGBM).
Like I posted earlier, the Rodale article made me come to conclude that the compact wrist computers I'm considering are not that far off from each other (algorithm- and feature-wise). With the remaining arbiter for me being the price, I'm still leaning towards the Xtender.
ddavid, what's making you hesitant about the Xtender? Have you also considered the cheaper Apeks Pulse (Dive Rite Nitek Plus)?