As @KenGordon (?) put it elsethread you're trying to fit a curve by two points. Or however many they picked for no apparent reason.
Obviously the numbers will differ, if they didn't they'd all be the same computer. Since these are curves, there'll be sections where they differ the most and ones where they differ the least. Do you think they know which sections their chosen points are in? For any given pair of computers they "tested".
Getting the actual curves plotted is of course difficult: you'd probably have to film the dials on a gopro and have an intern transcribe the numbers from the footage...
I mean, seriously. How hard is it to download the logs and see if the profiles computer think they were diving are the profiles the testers think they were diving? There may have been a screwed-up test or a faulty sensor, we'll never know. How hard is it to spend a couple of hours with software of your choice and run your profiles through ZHL and VPM so you'd have at least a reproducible reference point?
Utter rubbish.
Obviously the numbers will differ, if they didn't they'd all be the same computer. Since these are curves, there'll be sections where they differ the most and ones where they differ the least. Do you think they know which sections their chosen points are in? For any given pair of computers they "tested".
Getting the actual curves plotted is of course difficult: you'd probably have to film the dials on a gopro and have an intern transcribe the numbers from the footage...
I mean, seriously. How hard is it to download the logs and see if the profiles computer think they were diving are the profiles the testers think they were diving? There may have been a screwed-up test or a faulty sensor, we'll never know. How hard is it to spend a couple of hours with software of your choice and run your profiles through ZHL and VPM so you'd have at least a reproducible reference point?
Utter rubbish.