. . .
I'm an AOW diver who goes on a diving trip only once a year. Is it worth taking the nitrox course?
. . .
Based only on that information, you could be an AOW diver with 500 dives whose one trip a year is to advanced destinations like the Galapagos. I will assume that's not what you meant. Rather, it seems more likely you have maybe 50 dives and your one trip a year is to do some relaxed, tropical reef diving, where you aren't diving from sun-up to sundown or otherwise pushing the limits. Am I close?
In any case, a reasonable question is what is the limiting factor that typically results in your dives ending? Is it that you run low on air before you run low on no-deco time? Is it that you run low on no-deco time before you run low on air? Is it that the divemaster requires you to end the dive before you have run low on air or no-deco time?
The main benefit of Nitrox is extending your no-deco time. So, if you typically find yourself having to end a dive because your air runs low before your no-deco time runs low, then diving with Nitrox wouldn't give you the main benefit that Nitrox offers. Another benefit of Nitrox that can be traded off with increased no-deco time is increased safety buffer against DCS. However, if you are doing nice easy dives with lots of safety stop time in the shallows, long surface intervals, fewer than four dives a day, etc., then that's already keeping you pretty far from the no-deco limits.
Rescue is useful to all divers, no matter what kind of diving they are doing. Unless you can benefit from Nitrox for the reasons mentioned above, take Rescue first.