dbnewton
Contributor
I have never seen this either. I have three of these 109's, one on my regulator and two on my spare regulator. These have been in use and regularly serviced since the early 80's. Here are some pictures of the lever:
This was in the primary of my spare regulator being used by my son. It caused an immediate and complete failure during a dive so was as far as he knew an out of air situation (it wasn't truly since he could have used his own safe 2nd but he did not know that yet).
The irony of all this was we had just completed a practice of the out of air ascent during this same dive. So I thought he was trying to improve the practice by surprising me with an unplanned out of air simulation (he seemed way too calm for this to be a real OOA). But for him it was quite real. The final outcome was after stabilizing on my safe 2nd we discovered his safe 2nd was functional so he returned to his and we ended the dive.
After the dive I disassembled the 109 to understand what happened. Once I found the cause I also disassembled the other two. They show no sign of rust on the demand lever.
This was in the primary of my spare regulator being used by my son. It caused an immediate and complete failure during a dive so was as far as he knew an out of air situation (it wasn't truly since he could have used his own safe 2nd but he did not know that yet).
The irony of all this was we had just completed a practice of the out of air ascent during this same dive. So I thought he was trying to improve the practice by surprising me with an unplanned out of air simulation (he seemed way too calm for this to be a real OOA). But for him it was quite real. The final outcome was after stabilizing on my safe 2nd we discovered his safe 2nd was functional so he returned to his and we ended the dive.
After the dive I disassembled the 109 to understand what happened. Once I found the cause I also disassembled the other two. They show no sign of rust on the demand lever.