According to DSAT and some other agency, it is required for a technical diver to have a redundant BC (double bladder or a backup wing and etc.) What is the DIR's view in regards to back up bouyancy in tech diving?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
darylm74:......you should be able to swim it back up to the surface.
*Floater*:I was diving with a DIR oriented tech shop (Halcyon dealer, offers GUE courses, etc.) but they also had to cater to non-DIR customers for business reasons, so when someone wanted a DSAT course they'd just stack two Halcyon wings one on top of the other for redundant buoyancy. So what's my point? Well, I don't have one as far as this topic goes, but posted anyway. Sorry.
wunat:How about in cases where your rig fail while we are at a needed deco stop?
PerroneFord:If you're doing mandatory deco dives, you're in the water long enough to wear a drysuit. So wear one. And bring a bag to shoot.
PerroneFord:Why way off? We use them in Florida. Water temps can be 80F+. No one said you had to wear anything underneath them, and they have nearly no thermal properties. Speaking of a shell suit, not a neoprene drysuit.
Scubakevdm:A shell with nothing underneath is quite uncomfortable, trust me on that one. I do plenty of dives in Florida where I prefer a wetsuit. They swim alot better than a drysuit.