Jon,
Thanks for the reply, I thought this thread was abandoned.
I assure you that I know what a dive plan looks like. The "plan" I gave as an example was a simplistic one to illustrate that in most cases ordinary dive tables are no backup for a dive computer, which of course IS the topic of this thread. You CAN plan with a computer. You can plan on the fly with a computer. I think this is acceptable with typical open water diving, which is what I am talking about.
I fail to see why using a computer is taking your life into your hands any more than using dive tables. I'd rather use a computer than a PADI RDP any day.
The fact is, for this type of diving, you just don't need to plan the dive that closely. If you monitor your computer and air closely and follow basic rules (such as deep-to-shallow), you'll have no problems with a dive profile. The main problem as I see it is that with a puter, the diver themselves must set a level of conservatism for the dive. This can be taught.
The fact is that diver are not getting bent or dying just because of dive computers. The fact is that cavers and tech divers don't use them because they don't DO what they need them to do.
Every dive I go on I "blindly" rely on my regulator. However my eyes are open on the workings and limitations of computers. I've never had one quit, and I carry a backup.
Well, that's my opinion and I know I'm not alone with it. Bottom line, do what works for you in an informed way, and be consistent and safe. Peace.
Neil
Disclaimer and Plea: All my knowledge and opinions are based on open water, no-stop diving. If you reply, please don't mention caves, wrecks, tech, dives deeper than 130 ft., wings, backplates, 7 ft hoses, DIR or GIII. I don't really know jack about that stuff and am tired of hearing about it! Anybody seen any pretty fishes lately?