It's a signed form. The diver is asserting they have done that many dives. I think it holds water legally.LOL. Don't try and get a job with an insurance company!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
It's a signed form. The diver is asserting they have done that many dives. I think it holds water legally.LOL. Don't try and get a job with an insurance company!
You'd still have a tough time in court after the "accident".It's a signed form. The diver is asserting they have done that many dives. I think it holds water legally.
Respectfully disagree. I believe the signed statement of the diver who had the accident that he had logged X dives, meaning in good faith that he had done X dives, would be more dispositive than an argument over the definition of "logged."You'd still have a tough time in court after the "accident".
Respectfully disagree. I believe the signed statement of the diver who had the accident that he had logged X dives, meaning in good faith that he had done X dives, would be more dispositive than an argument over the definition of "logged."
I'll see her in court!My wife is a PI attorney. I asked her. She relishes the thought of suing an operator who relied solely on that number when taking a customer to an advanced diving site without further questions.
IANAL, but I don't see where a log book with a bunch of handwritten entries would make any difference; that would be very easy to fake. I think that "without further questions" is significant, as would be the practice I know most reputable ops on Cozumel have of taking a diver who is unknown to them out on easy dives to see how they handle themselves in the water before haring off with them to Punta Sur or Maracaibo.My wife is a PI attorney. I asked her. She relishes the thought of suing an operator who relied solely on that number when taking a customer to an advanced diving site without further questions.
IANAL, but I don't see where a log book with a bunch of handwritten entries would make any difference; that would be very easy to fake. I think that "without further questions" is significant, as would be the practice I know most reputable ops on Cozumel have of taking a diver who is unknown to them out on easy dives to see how they handle themselves in the water before haring off with them to Punta Sur or Maracaibo.
It's kinda like the AOW vs OW question. I have been diving on an OW cert since 1994; I think I qualify as "advanced" within my comfort zone of experience, much moreso than someone who went straight to AOW out of their OW class, and I am confident that I could demonstrate that to any dive op that doesn't know me, logbook (lack of it) and AOW cert (likewise) notwithstanding.
I'll see her in court!![]()
I can understand the c-card but a logbook?