Eric Sedletzky
Contributor
That kind of circles back to the beaten to death topic of the value of AOW in any sort of commercial application, such as dive boats using it as a guarantee of competency. One try-me dive of five different specialties without any further or specific training in any of the five, that shouldn’t be any sort of certification that can be used. A specialty cert after AOW yes, but AOW by itself no.That is why logged dives are really meaningless. A diver can create any sort of log you want in no time. The diver who bought my first computer was a beginner, but his computer log showed hundreds of dives to a maximum depth of 181 feet.
Now, put yourself in a dive operator's place when someone signs up for an advanced dive for which your insurance requires divers with advanced experience. You may argue all you want about whether that easily faked log is any better than an AOW card, but the AOW card has one significant advantage--someone else made the decision. If a diver dies on a deep dive in a way suggesting inadequate preparation, and you get sued, which of the following two statements would you prefer to make when testifying?
- As standard policy, we require divers to show evidence of adequate training for the dive. I saw his logbook, and after a careful review of the different dives he had done up to that point, I made the decision that he would be OK. It was a judgment call.
- As standard policy, we require an AOW card, and he had one.
I would rather see a log book of a basic OW diver, look at their gear, and have a discussion with the them about experience, how long they’ve been diving, etc. before I’d blindly trust an AOW diver with 9 total dives to their name (which is possible).
But for legality reasons I see your point.