I am actually enjoying the discussion here. Always happy to learn.
For my purchase, I am actually looking into computers that have been in the market for a few years. Scuba gear is pretty expensive for me locally so I was thinking of buying it from a different country. But if it fails, I won't be able to claim warranty.
Good to hear about you being happy to learn - decompression algorithms are a minefield and it is worth spending some time being comfortable with what you end up going for.
There is are a couple of statements (I don't have the time to find the actual quotes so I will paraphrase them but this will give the gist of what they think) that bear thinking about in this (both came from specialists in decompression medicine):
1) All models are wrong but some are useful.
2) Ask a new diver about what causes decompression sickness and they will tell you they aren't really sure, ask an experienced diver or instructor and they might tell you its all about micro-bubbles ascent rates etc but ask a decompression scientist and they will tell you they aren't really sure.
Knowing whether your algorithm is considered conservative or aggressive or the little things (such as sub 1hr surface intervals having a disproportionate effect) can affect how you dive. It is also worth noting that all algorithms are statistical in nature and that even following your computer perfectly does not guarantee you 100% safety from DCS.
Another thing that hasn't really been touched on by a lot of the posters above is that you might want to consider your algorithm (and conservatism) with regards to your age, general health, hydration etc. I would be more willing to dive an aggressive DC if I were 20 years younger and fit but as a mid 40's diver with a bit more padding than I should have, I will dive a bit more conservatively.