They never have been "bad". Someone didn't get their way with their unreasonable demands and is condemning the agency because of it. Much ado about nada, diddly and squat, in precisely that order.Is naui that bad these days?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
They never have been "bad". Someone didn't get their way with their unreasonable demands and is condemning the agency because of it. Much ado about nada, diddly and squat, in precisely that order.Is naui that bad these days?
Sure, but any agency that has been around will have some similar problems. My primary dive buddy's OW card is NASDS, which is now known as SSI. He doesn't show up in the computer, and they won't issue him a replacement. The plastic card was cracking and falling apart so we laminated it. Some dive ops have taken a bit of convincing, but he's generally been able to dive with it.Well, to be fair, dive ops are sometimes particular about certifications and there is some uncertainty in using a card that isn't readily recognized and can't be checked in an online database.
And organizations that offer training and certification do, IMO, have an implicit obligation to confirm who has and has not received the training and certification they offer. An example would be a four-year degree (B.A., B.S., etc). Institutions granting such degrees keep records in perpetuity and will supply transcripts and copies of the course catalog and degree requirements from the year the degree was conferred, upon request, for a nominal fee.
If the OP's c-card has no modern equivalent, it would still seem to me that NAUI would still have an obligation to replace the card with an identical one, and confirm its validity if asked.
Whether or not some amount of recurrent training is appropriate is a separate question.