With regard to the blog post by "Phil"...
First of all, interpretation of the 30% recurrence rate is problematic because it's not explained whether patients with an occurrence of IPE continue on with their in-water activities or to what extent they change their behavior. This is the problem with reporting this kind of data as a percentage because you really don't know what the denominator is.
Secondly, the assertion that divers afflicted with IPE "may also experience" IPE while swimming or snorkeling sounds more like a speculative statement than one based on numerous examples of real-world occurrences. When a scientist or clinician uses the word "may" in his statements, it simply means that "the possibility exists."
Rather than take my word for it (or anyone else's for that matter), I would recommend reading the primary literature. Use
PubMed and the
Rubicon Repository.