I can actually do conversations from psi/bar and from feet/meters in my head underwater. Danny made sure of that . . .
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
If fact, isn't 3m simply a crude approximation of 10ft?
Why bother when all gauges read to within 0.1m ? Could also say why don't people use 20ft software demand on imperial gauges. Again, there's no reason to.I've often wondered why those doing stage deco diving with meter depth gauges haven't demanded software that delivers stops in 5m increments.
No more than 10ft is just an arbitrary decision someone took back in the days of analogue gauges where reading any less than that was fairly difficult.
3m isn't a standard. Its just that convention has been implemented into software to fit that. Its arbitrary. They could also have put 5ft, 11ft, 15ft or 27.34632ft. The model would still work. There is no physics that says 10ft/3m has to be done.
.
Metric is the obvious choice. Quite apart from the convenience of working in base 10
That's right, imperial is binary. I have 110101110010 PSI of gas.
To try and steer this thread mildly back onto topic.
Can someone give an example of gas calculation using imperial? Nothing fancy.
Lets say the best mix for a 100/300' dive.
O2 to be a max of 1.2pp
And and Equivalent Narcotic depth of 40m/120'
It would be wonderful if all divers used the same system
Don't confuse this with the Minnesota Vikings, who use a base 11 system.
I know you were joking, but as I recall from my history, the imperial system is derived in large part from the Vikings, who used a base 12 system. That is why we have so many 12s in our lives (time of day, inches in a foot, people on a jury, etc.).
Don't confuse this with the Minnesota Vikings, who use a base 11 system.