EDIT: Thanks to the discussion, I put together this little diagram with powerpoint (as I am a horrible artist of any time, not just graphic). The idea is this. Take a uniform object (which people are not) but have the density vary. The center of buoyancy will be smack dab in the middle while the center of mass will be to the side of greater density. This results in more gravitational force to that one side. The buoyancy force is even across the device, so this results in rotation until the center of mass is inline with the center of buoyancy. Now I think how to modify it. I'm curious for anyone's feedback on if this makes the concepts of center of buoyancy and mass clear and why weight distribution is so important for achieving comfortable trim.
View attachment 614962
Nice diagram!! Some suggestions.
I would start with a uniform square with equal up and down arrows, demonstrating neutral buoyance.
Then your diagram, but change the big blue arrow to open black with "leads to" on the inside. Reusing the blue color was confusing. As you have vertical space, make the circle arrows extend further around to complete more of the circle, and maybe lose the twist in them.
Maybe fewer up down little arrows but add numbers to them to show they add up to the same. Or just use all the same size arrows but stack more of them at the dense end, and stack those same size arrows in two rows for the vertical bar if needed.
You could have a diagram with three rows.
The first of just weighting.
Then two of distribution as well. Each with bar level and bar later. The top with a non-uniform bar, the bottom with a uniform bar.
Neutral buoyancy:
Uniform square
(avoiding saying weighting that now, below, more fully includes amount and distribution)
Neutral buoyancy and neutral weight distribution:
uneven-bar-horizontal -> uneven-bar-vertical
even-bar-horizontal -> even-bar-horizontal
I've been using the term "neutral weight distribution" as the point is that gravity not dictate your orientation. Plus "neutral weight distribution" avoids the "horizontal uber elite" fight. And it matches "neutral weighting", but adds the second, essential, refinement to that. That you might also prefer horizontal orientation for many tasks is a choice you can then make easily after you have your neutral weight distribution. (By me, I mean non-instructor just-diver me.)
ETA: You could also use a circle. With a smiley face on it but a heavy forehead and light chin. It becomes an upside-down face that you convert to a frown as well.
, or on o face with raised eyebrows so the mouth is not 'up' in both. Though this works better for front-back trim, which is not the first point you need to get to.