Agreed.The failure point is the AI, not the computer. We dive with computers because they give us an advantage. We dive with SPG, depth gauges and simple bottom timers because they're simple tools that work if there's an issue with the computer. A computer on my wrist fails and poses no threat to my well being. A transmitter gets knocked off my first stage and I have an open high pressure port releasing gas - now I have an issue.
Think, breathe, then speak.
We did a dive to Hendley's Castle and the instructor we were with was old school, and old enough to recall the pre-computer, pre-accellerated deco days when that same dive required a few hours of deco rather than 20 minutes.
When you look at it that way, technical divers are very open to change and promote that change They after all are the reason everyone dives nitrox now at all as technical divers were using it when it was considered voodoo gas by all of the recreational scuba agencies and authorities.
What technical divers do not support are new gee whiz gadgets just for the sake of having new gee whiz gadgets. If you can show where AI will significantly improve the capability of technical diving without adding undue risk or needless complexity, technical divers will beat a path to your door. Until then, expect to just get beat.