Green_Manelishi
Contributor
Lisa0825:Ah, gotcha.
Now as far as intelligent design goes, I have always believed that our creation was via evolution but that it did not rule out a creator utilizing that as a method. My problem with intelligent design is that some religious communities are trying to force it to be taught in schools, and since it brings religion directly into the mix, it does not belong in public schools where no single faith should be taught, if you believe in a separation of church and state.
Except that macro-evolution (one life form morphing into another over time) does not allow for any outside influence; it's all "just happening". Macro-evolution fails scientific scrutiny just as "ID" does; it is not being observed, it has not been observed, it is not testable and repeatable. It is assumed, on faith, to have happened because of the fossil record ... which by the way is completely absent the "interim life forms" that should be abundant if evolution was in fact occuring or had occured. ID (God or not) simply claims the reason there is no abundance of fossil interim life forms is that all was created rather than a big accidental, messy, just happened.
Finally, the "separation of church and state" occurs nowhere in the US Constitution.