I call BS on the number of diver impacts. I've seen some bad divers here and there but the average diver is not hitting the reef six times in 30 minutes.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That's why I said "screw it and bought a house in Bonaire. Moving there this winter for good.This climate change pissoff belongs in the Pub. And nobody here has any grounds to be sanctimonious. The carbon footprint from jetting to dive destinations and riding dive boats to the reefs far outweighs any savings from paper straws or reusable shopping bags.
Dave Dillehay and Memo Mendoza, l would like to hear your plans for adjusting to the restrictions as they develop. I will be down in March, and maybe things will have changed by then. I won’t miss the Palancar sites that much, except that Bricks was always a good place to finish a dive at Columbia Deep. I would miss the Columbia sites, Punta Sur, Maracaibo and Los Islotes. Possible east side dives further north could be interesting. Personally, I am really happy with Delilah and La Francesca any time. You can always start on the wall and come in shallow. I haven’t seen that much of Santa Rosa or San Francisco lately, but those are good options. I personally think Yucab, Tormentos, and Punta Tunich are under-appreciated. I like the northern sites, and Steve Hazard, Tracey Winholt, and I dove one that was pretty shallow and benign a couple of years ago. I thought Steve had a name for it, but I’m not sure it’s really a recognized site. Did not have the dramatic coral of the south, but lots of critters and we found a huge field of sea grass with clouds of razorfish, algae crabs, and other interesting stuff. You had to go slow and focus, but it was magical. Of course, Barracuda and the “adventure” dives will still have to be restricted to properly qualified divers, but you might want to expand availability of these dives. I know you haven’t had time to develop alternative plans yet, but please keep us posted. Oh, and please, the C-53 is not a good option. Been there, done that, not worth the time or gas. There’s plenty to keep me coming back and I have no plans to change my March plans.
This is why I don't buy lottery tickets. We are arriving on the 5th and are planning our first boat dive on the 7th.
This is going to be awfully strange to the fishes who are used to seeing many divers every day and then, suddenly, nothing.
So, as an actual scientist who leads a group of scientists (but not marine biologists), this shut down concerns me.
It is very likely that everything they are proposing is ad hoc and not scientifically derived or controlled. In spite of this, it is very likely they will observe some improvement in the corals as the waters cool for the winter after a summer at 85-86 F.
Then in January their psuedoscience will conclude the closure helped and the result will be future closures based on bunk science.
Edit: I am betting Memo (above) sees diseased brain corals up north in those hidden spots he dives that only they go to.
So, as an actual scientist who leads a group of scientists (but not marine biologists), this shut down concerns me.
It is very likely that everything they are proposing is ad hoc and not scientifically derived or controlled. In spite of this, it is very likely they will observe some improvement in the corals as the waters cool for the winter after a summer at 85-86 F.
Then in January their psuedoscience will conclude the closure helped and the result will be future closures based on bunk science.
Edit: I am betting Memo (above) sees diseased brain corals up north in those hidden spots he dives that only they go to.