They said that the DM had restricted the dive to rebreathers only because of the strong current,
Can you elaborate on this?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
They said that the DM had restricted the dive to rebreathers only because of the strong current,
Oh right, it must be their fault in some way and they go and cover it up.If you do a search here on SB, there is a pattern that when bad things happen in that area SFDHQ is usually involved, followed by a change of name of their boat.
A stern tie in that causes a sinking, somehow is also not their fault. Changing a vessels name, does not make up for poor decision making.Oh right, it must be their fault in some way and they go and cover it up.
Can you elaborate on this?
Just relaying what the guys we picked up told us. It made some sense, given that open circuit divers would have been working pretty hard and burned a bunch of gas on their way down the mooring line. In contrast, the hot drop was pretty easy. Getting their mooring ball off the wreck was not so easy.
Yes, I am aware.Regarding the vessel name changes, my understanding is that the Black Pearl also had a different name prior to another fatality in the inlet years ago.
Lance
The way I read it was that it was a hot drop on the Lowrance and a ball at the Capt Dan. I guess the 3 divers picked up by the private boat were from the Capt Dan but not sure. The retrieved ball was from the Capt Dan.
@VsubT is this correct?
Oh, absolutely true, but rebreather divers are at a significant risk of CO2 toxicity from exertion, if they overbreathe the scrubber. This has happened to me...@doctormike Apologies if I misunderstood about rebreathers versus open circuit, I’m not a rebreather diver. I do know that you can burn a lot of gas on OC fighting a current though.
Lance