Plastic models, Oriskany vs. Essex

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

SelkieDVM

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Divemaster
Messages
808
Reaction score
40
# of dives
200 - 499
So I'm planning a trip to dive the USS Oriskany this summer and the geek in me thought it would be a cool idea to put together a plastic model of the ship in the meantime. I realize there would likely be significant differences between the model and the actual ship but at least it would give me a vague idea of the layout in 3D, especially the superstructure (this would be a recreational dive).

Trouble is, I can't find a model of the Oriskany itself. There are, however, models of the USS Essex available, the same class aircraft carrier. So my questions for the Navy vets/historians/modelers out there, how different are these two ships? Should I just stick to pictures? Does anybody know where I could order a (cheap) model of the Oriskany online?

Thanks!
Lilla
 
A model isn't going to offer anything about the layout, the models are crude and show only the most basic structural outlines....but I admire your desire to learn about it.

Here's what's I'd do in the meantime with the extra time before the dive. Read everything you can about the O and about that era of aircraft carriers. Study the pictures and examine the cutaways and build diagrams if you can find them. Read about the O, the history of the build, and the role it played in US history. Then go one step further and hit some of the veteran forums and see if you can't talk to some guys that served on her....hear their personal stories and learn how a ship becomes more than a method of transportation for those that serve on her, how in a short time it becomes part of you forever.

I promise promise promise that this dive will then be more than a just a cool dive, it'll be a profound experience.


Sorry if this sounded corny....


Regards,

Danny



Here's a couple to get you started:

USS Oriskany (lots of good links)

CV-9 ESSEX Class (good links on right sidebar)
 
Dig, that's a great idea when it comes to diving a historic wreck where you can still find people who served aboard the very ship you'll be diving on. It would definitely enhance the experience to say the least. I might do that very thing you mentioned before making a trip to dive the mighty O.

Shane
 
Great suggestions - I'll definitely be doing some of these things. It will add to the excitement beforehand and the enjoyment once I get there. I really didn't intend the model to help with serious dive planning, just to get an overall sense and to amuse myself in the meantime. I used to enjoy model building as a kid, and thought this would be a good opportunity to take it up again to some extent. To that end, I suppose a model of the Essex would suffice.

Thank you!
L.
 
The Essex class was in servcie for a long time and most underwent at least one major modernization and several underwent two modernizations.

The original Essex class was a straight deck carrier made in both short and long hull versions (the major external difference being the clipper bow on the long hull Essex carriers.) Each ship as constructed also differed and many of the early essex class carriers had the bridge modified later in the war while late construction Essex carriers had the modified bridge from the start. Some Essex carriers also had the CIC moved from the bridge to the gallery deck, so internal layouts differed almost from the start.

Post war, most Essex carriers were modified with an angled flight deck but there were (if I remember correctly) 3 major differences in the modernization programs. The Essex carriers receiving the full angled deck and modernization package were reclassified as Hancock class carriers while ships that received a more austere modernization with angled decks were classified as "Modernized Essex" carriers. The Oriskany was different in that it was completed post war to a unique angled deck design utilizing significant amounts of aluminum plate rather than wood plank on the landing portion of the flight deck. Nearly all the Essex class straight deck or otherwise were modified with enclosed "hurricane" bows as part of the modernization process.

In 1952 the Navy also divided the CV designation into "CVA" for attack carriers and "CVS" for anti-submarine or ASW carriers. The CVA's were optimized for strike aircraft while the CVS carriers were optimized for the ASW role and some even had sonar packages installed. The differences were in the details of elevator and catapult modifications as well as in some internal layout and equipment changes.

The smaller decks on the Modernized Essex/Hancock class CVA's were not able to efficiently operate newer and larger aircraft such as the F-4 Phantom and A-6 Intruder so during their Vietnam era deployments they normally operated the F-8 Crusader and A-4 Skyhawk or A-7 Corsair with a greater emphasis on light attack rather than all weather heavy attack aircraft.

The limitation in aircraft operational flexibility led to their withdrawl from service in the late 1960's so in general the CVS carriers stayed in service a bit longer lasting until the mid 1970's and in the case of the Lexington - into the 1980's as a training carrier until it was replaced by the Midway class Coral Sea. To make it confusing however the US Navy reverted to the general multi-role CV designation for all its carriers in the early 1970's regardless of whether or not they were modified to handle both strike and ASW aircraft so carriers were redesignated even in the reserve fleet with no modifcations received.

In terms of exterior appearance the Lexington in its later angled deck configuration has been kitted on and off over the years and it is probably as close to the 1970's era Oriskany as you will find.
 
Try....
Welcome to and Oriskany Museum and USS Oriskany Reunion Association

The Oriskany was launched as a straight deck and served through 1956 with a straight wooden deck. Aluminum angled Deck came along in 1959-1960. She was decommissioned for the last time in 1976. (She was considered for re-activation in 1981).

4 essex class carriers are museums now: Lexington in Corpus Christi Texas, USS Intrepid in New york City, USS Yorktown in USS Charleston SC, and USS Hornet in Alameda California are all Essex class carriers in the same general configuration as Oriskany.

We tried to get Revell to start production of their Oriskany model a few years ago - but it was going to be too costly. The only models that you'll find fairly common nowadays are on ebay, and they're currently going for around $350.
 
Thanks guys! This is very interesting. I'll see if I can find a model of Lexingtion then. I visited the Yorktown once many years but I don't remember much. Funny thing is I have a brother in Charleston but didn't think to tour the carrier again when I visited him last summer. Don't think I'll get I chance to get down there again before the Oriskany trip. Oh well...

Thanks again.
 
Don't feel too bad about missing the Yorktown.

Both the CV-10 and CV-34 were modernized under the SCB-27 program. However the CV-10 was an SCB-27A conversion with hydraulic catapults completed in 1953 as a CVA and further modernized with an angled deck and hurricane bow under the SCB-125 program in 1955. However in the late 50's the CVA-10 was reassigned to the ASW role along with the other hydraulic catapulted SCB-27A/SCB-125 carriers as a CVS.

The CV-34 on the other hand was the prototype SCB-27 modernized to that standard in 1951 and was the last SCB-125 modernized carrier but in 1959 became the only carrier completed to the much more comprehensive SCB-125A standard. Among other things during this modernization, the hydraulic catapults were replaced with steam catapults and the aluminum flight deck was added. Given that she had steam catapults, she remained in the CVA role throughout her career.

So in short, not even counting the numerous refits each ship received or the post fire repairs and changes to the CVA-34, their modernization programs were different which impacted their internal layout and deck plans and the CV-34 was pretty unique among Essex class carriers.
 
There are/were deck plans available for the Oriskany although due to refits they should not be used for planning penetration routes.
 
I have done the Oriskany twice and am getting set to go again in two weeks. While browsing at my LDS for something else in a catalog, I found some renderings of the Mighty O as she sits now that could came in sizes from place mat to poster. From the picture, my own photos, dive op videos and memory they seemed like something that may be of help to new divers as far as orienting them to the layout. I have to be in the shop tomorrow. I will look for it again and let you know what I find.
 

Back
Top Bottom