- Messages
- 1,849
- Reaction score
- 550
- # of dives
- None - Not Certified
I'm going to hit the sac. 

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The question as best I can remember is as follows:
An object weighing 50 kg/125 lbs displaces 2 cubic feet of sea water and is lying in 56 feet of depth. What amount of lead (disregarding the water displaced by the mass of the lead) would be required to add 20 kg/50 lbs of negative buoyancy to the object?
I really don't see any practical application to this problem to begin with, but I'm just curious how you'd figure it out.
I agree with both statements above. Happily, this is a question where both sides have a legitimate claim to victory.
Johnny has 3 apples. If you beat the **** out of Johnny and take away 50 of his apples, how many of his apples have you taken away?
The answer is 50. Not 53.
42?????? Must have used those Apples to make some potent fermented product I guess.The answer is 42.
What amount of lead (disregarding the water displaced by the mass of the lead) would be required to add 20 kg/50 lbs of negative buoyancy to the object?
Would not be the first time that a meaningless test question appeared on an examIf that is the intended purpose of the question, it teaches you absolutely nothing about buoyancy! I'm not saying you're wrong, all I'm saying is that the question is useless as far as diving is concerned in that case.
![]()
The fact that the wrong answer has been propagated by an OW instructor (and many divers) makes me sad.