On my last dive to 400 Ft...

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

redhatmama:
But to rail against swimthroughs and label them caves is indicative of something other than rational thought.

You continually try to downplay the dangers of this particular site yet the description of it that you posted describes exactly the dangers Mike and the others are talking about. You keep going back and forth between "its easy, everyone does it" to "they only take experienced people there after checking them out" yet a quick search through these forums shows that the checkout dives can be as sketchy as the dive itself.
To then imply that Mike is not being rational? I think pride has gotten in the way of reason and you don't want to admit you are wrong.

The best part about this thread is that hopefully if someone is doing research before diving that site they will find it and instead of one person saying "jump in the pools open, 1000's of people do this every day" they will be able to read the other "irrational" posts and hopefully learn something.
 
redhatmama:
Well, Mike, I believe I mentioned lack of life only pertaining to the small reef swimthrough known as the Devil's Throat which is not part of any cave system. It is a hole in the reef and the surrounding reef of Punta Sur is lush with life. If you had actually dived this site, you would understand this. I must assume that the entire diving world is wrong and the zealous few on scubaboard are right in labeling it a "cave." The site is often featured in recreational diving magazines as a recreational dive. It's been dived safely by thousands of people and is dived safely every day.

You would have a more valid point in railing against the Cancun operators who lead OW divers into cenotes on guided cavern dives where there is an overhead environment and untrained divers. But to rail against swimthroughs and label them caves is indicative of something other than rational thought.

I didn't label it anything since I'm not the one who defined what a cave or cavern is. My cave diveing training was through the NACD and I was a PADI cavern instructor. Based on my training, I would treat that as a cave/cavern dive and see no reason that it should be in any way expempt from commonly accepted cave/cavern diving procedures. If I was guiding students the standards that apply are very clear.

As I tried to explain, training standards and recommended procedures do not distinguish between a cavern or swimthrough. If you are in the lighted zone of a natural overhead, you are in a cavern. Beyond the naturally lighted zone, you are in the cave zone. I would venture to guess that a huge percentage of the divers in Cozumel are PADI certified and many of the dM's and instructors probably hold PADI tickets. I told you what PADI training standards state...which is also the recommended limit for a certified cavern/wreck divers.

I state again. the max penetration being depth + penetration is NOT to be more than 130 ft. That means that an instructor can NOT take a student into any overhead at 130 ft and the recommended limits for a PADI certified cavern diver would be ZERO penetration at 130ft, 1 ft at 129ft, 2 ft at 128ft ect. That would seem to set even a "swim through" off limits at that depth. In addition cavern students are not to be taken into restrictions and restrictions are beyond the recommended limits of a certified cavern diver. Given the depth and the apparent exixtance or what would be considered a minor restriction, the dive appears to be beyond the recommended limits of even a certified, properly equiped cavern diver. The PADI wreck course also places the exact same limits on penetration. These are NOT my opinions.

To further inform you, at one time it was commonly accepted that students/divers should never be taken into any overhead unless they were trained for them. Eventually the issue of swim throughs came up and PADI issued a statement in their training bulliten. I believe it came up partly because of all the artificial wrecks with weel houses that were made "OW safe" and all the toys they sink in dive parks. I don't have it handy but you might want to look it up yourself but from the descriptions I've heard I wouldn't call those structures swimthroughs based on what I remember reading of PADI guidlines.


I must assume that the entire diving world is wrong and the zealous few on scubaboard are right in labeling it a "cave."

The whole diving world? I think you'll find the poionts I stated consistant with the standards and practices or PADI, NACD, NSS-CDS, IANTD and most if not all other agencies. It seems more like a few Cozemel oporators and some non-cave trained divers are taking a stance that's contrary to the "whole diving world" and not the other way around. I think you'll also find that most trained overhead divers will share my opinion. So, it seems a few non-trained folks disagree with just about all the trained folks.

I gave you the information I can. I stated my sources that you are more than free to consult yourself. You even read the opinion of GDI who is, himself, a qualified and active cave instructor. Now you do what you want. It really is no skin off my nose either way.

And for the record, I strongly disagree with the practice of leading non-trained divers through caves in places like Canun and Akumal.
 
Stephen, there you go, taking on the whole diving world like some kind of zealot. I can hear the monkeys flapping their wings already.
 
MikeFerrara:
Stephen, there you go, taking on the whole diving world like some kind of zealot. I can hear the monkeys flapping their wings already.

I just feel bad for poor ole Soggy!

I've gotta run but I do have an interesting tale of one particular "cavern" dive in Akumal. To make a long story short... when we surfaced, I noticed that we were one OW diver short. The cave instructor/guide said, "Oh, she must have got out." :huh:
 
Stephen Ash:
I just feel bad for poor ole Soggy!

I've gotta run but I do have an interesting tale of one particular "cavern" dive in Akumal. To make a long story short... when we surfaced, I noticed that we were one OW diver short. The cave instructor/guide said, "Oh, she must have got out." :huh:

:freak:
 
plankspanker:
To then imply that Mike is not being rational? I think pride has gotten in the way of reason and you don't want to admit you are wrong.

That would certainly be irrational since I will be in Cozumel in January diving Devil's Throat again. Why don't you look up some other member here who has dived it and try and get them to repent their sins? You would have better luck.
 
Stephen Ash:
I just feel bad for poor ole Soggy!

I've gotta run but I do have an interesting tale of one particular "cavern" dive in Akumal. To make a long story short... when we surfaced, I noticed that we were one OW diver short. The cave instructor/guide said, "Oh, she must have got out." :huh:

The first time that I was at 40 fathom grotto, I remember the guy telling me that they were very proud of the fact that they had never lost a diver. he said "look, the place isn't all that big. They're all right down there.":D
 
ghostdiver1957:
In my local area there are a number of "recreational" divers who have started doing "tech" diving without any furtherance of training. The wake up call was to them... not to well trained and experienced technical divers.

What bothers me is that shops are selling and in some cases pushing "tech" gear and diving without being set up to train people in it. I've been in shops where the owner was talking tech diving to a guy who just finished his OW that wanted to go see a wreck 200 feet down. That guy needs a wake up call and so does the shop owner... What say you techies... am I right or wrong?

There is certainly nothing wrong with discussing Tech diving with an OW student. Maybe he was trying to sell training? I've certainly discussed trimix, deco theory, and other tech things with the LDS tech instructor (who was my OW instructor BTW). That does NOT mean I'm about to run out and do a 200' dive without training.

I don't agree with diving without training. This includes 30' reefs where I've seen a few OW divers that should have more training before doing THAT! :D

Open vauge posts saying I saw guy X talking to Newbie Y, and they are guilty of Z seem to me to belong on wine and cheeze!!!

Do you have some REAL examples of this issue, or RU just bored, and wanting to complain about STUFF!
 
RonFrank:
There is certainly nothing wrong with discussing Tech diving with an OW student. Maybe he was trying to sell training? I've certainly discussed trimix, deco theory, and other tech things with the LDS tech instructor (who was my OW instructor BTW). That does NOT mean I'm about to run out and do a 200' dive without training.

I don't agree with diving without training. This includes 30' reefs where I've seen a few OW divers that should have more training before doing THAT! :D

Open vauge posts saying I saw guy X talking to Newbie Y, and they are guilty of Z seem to me to belong on wine and cheeze!!!

Do you have some REAL examples of this issue, or RU just bored, and wanting to complain about STUFF!

I've got enough examples to clog your mouth with. I think you not only belong in wine and cheese... you probably invented the category. I've seen "tech" divers banging into reefs in 30 feet of water all the while telling everyone how superior they were.

Lets face reality... there are good and bad tech divers and there are good and bad recreational divers... but ultimately a "tech" diver is still just a recreational diver... unless they are diving in their profession... and then they are a professional or commercial diver. The lines are blurred between the two. There is not a formal enough educational or certification process in place. Yes, there are "tech" training programs... but they differ from one place to the next. Some are excellent... some are nothing more than an OW Instructor teaching Nitrox, Wreck Penetration and Cave Diving.

There are also many tech divers and recreational divers alike that have been diving for 20, 30 even 40 years with no formal training at all... and they're still alive and kicking. Why is it that they can succeed without formal training but no one getting into diving today can?

Back to the example you used to attack my post... this was about an OW Instructor / Shop Owner telling a recently certified OWD that he should watch his gauges closely if he decided to go to 200 feet... and oh, he should wear doubles. I don't think that belongs in wine and cheese... I think it belongs on a big sign that reads DANGER DANGER Avoid this shop... and posted all over the internet... but that's not my job... I'll let you techies police yourselves
 

Back
Top Bottom