Oms IQ Vs DR Transpack 2 , With Dr Wings?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

It won't even be close to $800 ... much, much less ... but more than the existing single wings.

As much as this will be a fun project, the O Pac is what really excited me ... too cool.

Patrick
 
Patrick, tell us more about the O-Paq? Is it similar to the IQ-Pak? FYI - My oxycheq wing works great with my IQ Pak for all of those looking at mixing OMS and Oxycheq. Infact, a few buddies will be ordering a some wings from Patrick in the near future. Go Oxycheq!!
 
I felt there was a market for a no-nonsence semi rigid or soft plate design that utilized a "Hogarthian" harness. The O-Pac is the result of the desire to serve that market. For what it is worth, the "O" is short for OxyCheq.

It is the size of our medium back plate, has the same holes and slots that a plate would have, is rigged with a Hogarthian harness and crotch strap (with appropriate D-rings), has a soft pad, shoulder harness pads, and two cam straps. It was designed specfically for single tank diving, but does have side mount capabilities. It is very compact, very comfortable, very light weight, will be very reasonably priced and does not require a STA although one can be used with it. Due to the size, low profile and weight, it is a great travel system. The target market are those single tank divers that want more comfort than a plate, but want the advantages of a "Hogarthian" harness.

For those that want the weight of a plate, you can add two bullet weights on each side of the CAM straps for four pounds.

Chris at COVCI showed the O-Pac to a few people at the demo in Ohio. Chris had the prototype and was asked to get some feedback. So far, a typical reaction when someone sees it or puts it on is a "giggle" or "grin" (I did both and so did Chris) because the thing is so simple and slick. When I gave the designs to the mfg. (who has been mfg BCs and wings for over 25 years) he did not seem too excited and I think he thought I was missing a few marbles. When the prototype was completed, he called me and expressed nothing short of praise on the design. The best way to describe it is elegantly simple and it is the most comfortable thing I ever had on my back to secure a cylinder. Combined with our single tank wings, this will be a very nice system. The intergrated weight pockets are also in process and should be available around the same time ... sorry, nothing unique there.

Chris had some people try it on in Ohio with an AL80. I think I saw someone post something about it in one of the threads. We have made a couple of minor changes to the original prototype that Chris had ... or still has.

I don't have any good photos of it (black is a pain in the *^^ to shoot), but hope to have some good photos once the production units arrive. If you had it on and looked in a mirror, you would think you had on a hard plate.

There are also a number of other products in the works.

I do appreciate your interest in the O-Pac and for allowing me the bandwith to discuss it. If anyone thinks I am out of my mind, no need to tell me ... I knew that long ago. :wacko:

Best regards,

Patrick
OxyCheq
http://oxycheq.com
 
Hello -

As promised I met up with Patrick at DEMA and checked out the Meow and the O-Paq.

The Meow is a nice single tank wing with a zipper that exposes the internal bladder. The prototype at the show was cordura, not kevlar. Should be easy enough to change over.

The O-Paq is a very nice semi-rigid BP and harness design. This may be the rig for recreational and sidemount diving.

I don't think it has enough strength to make big doubles comfy, but maybe it does.

It seemed to be a lot more comfy than the various IQ and Trans paqs that I have tried on.

Good stuff.

Peter
 
Hi Peter,

As I may have mentioned, I did not design the O-Pac for diving doubles. However, I did have several people that I repsect at the show tell me that the have no doubt that it could easily handle doubles by simply using longer CAM straps.

When things slow down, I will have some longer CAM straps made and do a few tests on it.

In order to get the wing done for the show, we used material that was readliy available. The production run will be made of Kevlar and production should begin very soon.

I did not have the 18# single wing or the double bladder 70# at DEMA, but the prototypes are arriving today ... better late than never.

Thanks for dropping by the booth.

Best regards,

Patrick
OxyCheq
 
So the meow was a wing with an internal bladder? I dont get it? I just ordered a dive rite wing with inner bladder, personaley being a wreck diver i wouldnt go with anything less. Once the Oxychecks have been out long enough, and people dive them as much as the Halcyon's, dive-rite's, etc, i will definatley consider them. So far i have heard very good things with the oxycheck system, so keep up the good work Patrick.
 
The Trek wings are not very good for single tanks. The Venture wings have a really funky silhouette. Not sure what DR's intent is with that design.

The local DR store just went belly up, sigh. So I don't have a good way to test it myself.

Peter
 
I dont know aboutt he trek wings, but i did here very good things about the DR REC wings, im looking at those right now , and the halycons, ;)
 

Back
Top Bottom