oldschoolto
Contributor
Are you guys for real... Just dive it... Not a thing wrong with it...
Jim...
Jim...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
@Steve_C I think you may have missed an invisible smilie on the post about O2 settling to the bottom of the tank.
I would dive it without any hesitation at all, but I would re-analyze it. That's free and takes less than a minute.
The tank is NOT in violation of any law or even industry standard. It just can't be re-filled without an inspection. If it's an AL tank, oxidation is very very unlikely to be an issue, and the fact that it's nitrox probably decreases the likelihood of a wet fill.
We have some real nervous nellies around here.....it's not like it's prehistoric air found in an ancient tomb.
When my brother told me about this, I thought what a waste of money. Every yr he has to go through the same process diligently otherwise he won't be able to have them filled.So when you start thinking about testing etc, keep it into perspective, rather than "if you dont follow our regulations you WILL DIE". In OZ we hydro yearly, in USA every 5 years, and whats the difference? apart for someone making a lot of money, we still have tank failures in OZ.
Anyway your money, I know what I would do.
Wait what? Are you thinking it's going to implode when breathing from it?
No the problem is with complacency, when the basics become 'grey' you are on a slippery slope. But hey, if the "internet" is prepared to dive a 18 month old cylinder them it must be good. Why even bother analysing the gas, what could possibly happen in 18 months?
The last fill was in Aug '15, I would love to know the date of the last vis/hydro on the cylinder in question.