fppf
Contributor
Peter C
Yes, but the Oceanic Atom 2.0 is only $900. Which is one of the reasons I bought one.
Yes, but the Oceanic Atom 2.0 is only $900. Which is one of the reasons I bought one.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
fppf:Peter C
Yes, but the Oceanic Atom 2.0 is only $900. Which is one of the reasons I bought one.
fppf:Doug
Thanks for the comments, its nice to see oceanic is pushing the limits.
I think your on the right track. However I don't think having a set position will work for the masses. I can see a real need to have an easy way for the user to make small adjustments to the location of the display location. Maybe a small jack screw setup??
It would also be a huge plus if you could make the mask clear instead of black.
Keep up the good work we love our atom 2.0.
Oceanlog needs help though.
fppf:Doug
It would also be a huge plus if you could make the mask clear instead of black.
.
fppf:I don't agree with that.
I had no problem seeing the display in full sunlight in the Cayman's with the contrast set porperly.
LOL....great pointfppf:Besides, how much light do you think we get 130 feet down in lake Erie? LOL