The cracking effort and flow rate of the Argonaut Kraken is on par with all modern regulators it was compared with and was actually better than most. It's not your Grandfather's double hose by any stretch.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I don't find them to be even close. I think there's a reason they aren't mainstream anymore and marketing isn't one of them.
I would agree with you that unmodified DH regs of the past, esp with old parts were pretty poor performers compared to modern single hose regs but it's not true of updated ones. I have access to a modern computer based flow bench and recently had my Kraken double hose tested....in all fairness it's tweaked to the edge...but the results were impressive. It beat every single modern single hose reg in the computers data base including a Scubapro MK-25/A700 and an Atomic, don't recall which one, the only one that was better was a Posiden MK-3. The only time single hose regs got close or exceeded the Kraken (except for the Posiden) was on when the flow rates got above 11 CFM, which is a lot more than a diver can breath.
I have yet to test any of my updated DH reg but I suspect they will also come close since most of the updates are used in the Kraken....todays DH reg is not the same as the ones from the past.
Bryan
Without giving away too many secrets, what did you do to make the Kraken performance so much better than older DH regs?
Since we just got a spot in the manufacturers section of the board.....
I want a Kraken