Peo
Registered
Rick Murchison:When you throw out all the rhetoric and get right down to actions and money spent, the United States wins hands down.
Rick
Can you put some numbers and sources behind that statement?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Rick Murchison:When you throw out all the rhetoric and get right down to actions and money spent, the United States wins hands down.
Rick
Kim:As I mentioned earlier Finland scores very well on environmental issues. There's some interesting stuff on this page:
http://www.vexen.co.uk/countries/best.html
Interestingly enough as well as winning the environmental section Finland seems to be the best economically competitive country as well. This would appear to run counter to the often presented argument that environmental controls are bad for business. I suppose it might probably have more to do with the original efficiency or inefficiency of manufacturing as to how much it costs to make it conform to acceptable environmental standards.
jbilicska:Another vote for the US. Once we make giant strides foward it is up to each of us to make sure we don't slide backwards.
We have such a diversity of ecosystems that makes it hard to save them all at once.
vladimir:Just checking your reasoning here. Pacifism=environmentalism=anti-Americanism?
drbill:I'd like to think that humans have evolved, or at least could evolve, past strictly "selfish" (= survival) values. My favorite poet, Robinson Jeffers, spoke of a philosophy he called Inhumanism in which humans "uncentered" themselves and looked at the Earth and the Universe with a broader perspective. I'd like to think that kind of enlightenment is possible.
But then I think of the more recent history where the Marine Life Protection Act, passed to create a series of scientifically-based marine protected areas in California, was sidelined due to political pressure and... oh, yes, the convenient excuse of our budget crisis.
JustinW:Take a sip of Kool-aid and just don't you worry comrad.
My only doubt is here = http://snipurl.com/l3qt
Anyhow, being hooked up to the EU grid isn't necessarily a bad thing, parts f the EU use Nuclear power extensively, which environmentalists go nuts about if we build. Come to think of it, they freak out of we build hydroelectric plants too, because they flood forests and alter flows of rivers yada yada. Solar and other options aren't up to snuff yet, but Nuclear power is one of the cleanest and most efficient sources of power. Vote is still for the Stars and stripes for reasons mentioned previously by myself and others. While RSA has the second largest coal power plant in the world, and seeing it, it isn't the most beautiful thing, RSA (especially in the limpopo province and east cape) also participate in Ecotourism converting millions of hectares of bushveld from cattle and sheep farms into hunting concessions where indigenous species are being restored in great numbers and are being carefully monitored by conservation officials. We have to find financial incentives for people to help the environment, especially in poorer countries. If these countries can turn their natural resources into attractions, they will be able to profit from their preservation, versus starving and destroying resources just to make it to the next day.
Come to think of it, the Nobel Prize is pretty corrupt anyhow, between the bribery, politics and stringpulling, any Nobel given likely went to those with the best connections having little to do with the award itself, if you have looked at the nominees for other Nobel prizes you know exactly what i mean.
KOMPRESSOR:Man, that's one scary link you've got there! Are there really people who believe in this stuff, or are you just playing some irony here? Anyway, to claim the Nobel Prize Commity is corrupt is a bit on the far side. Don't you think?
What I appreciate about many US citizens is that they can mobilize a lot of effort in something they believe in. Some of you guys simply have a lot of "drive" for the matters you work for, and private citizens can accomplish a lot if the money comes available. While over here we may tend to expect the government to support the good thoughts with actions. And very often it does, luckily. I suppose that's one of the benefits of not having money and economy ruling everywhere.