I don't think that any agency or instructor except UTD claims the DIR moniker anymore since the term is archaic and diluted these days in its meaning. So technically Andrew can call whatever he wants DIR/UTD as he does in the video for his new BC. I'm sure that UTD will be able to adequately incorporate the new wing into their training protocols. However, I think that you'd probably get some funny looks if you walked into a GUE Fundamentals class with one of these wings. LOL.
On the other hand, I do have to give props to UTD for trying to develop new types of gear in an industry which is slow to change. I may not be an adopter of their practices, but I can keep an open enough mind to objectively see what they have to offer and see if it makes sense for my diving. If I can make a mis-sized crappy rental jacket BC work for me, I'm sure I'm versatile enough to make this work for me if I had no other choice of BC to use. I just can't really comment on the build quality of their gear as I do not have any first hand experience with it, nor do I know anyone with any long term experience with any UTD equipment. Reliability is pretty important to me in terms of gear I purchase, and with no history it's tough for me to assess quality. I'd actually be interested in hearing if anyone (not affiliated with UTD) has bought and used any of their equipment at all.
Edit: Another more specific question is does anyone know who makes these BCs for UTD and what is their history with manufacturing BCs?