paulwall:
I dropped the tank off, told them to fill it to 3000 psi with EAN32. I'll get it topped off with air somewhere else.
Personally, I don't recommend this practice, unless you are up front with the second shop about what's in the tank. And wouldn't it have been cheaper just to have the first shop do a full 30% fill, rather than pay for a Nitrox fill and then an air fill on top of that?
paulwall:
So, to explore this further, The shop has 3 5000psi bank tanks (unknown capacity), plus a compressor to pump them up to 5000. With a slow fill, how much of that 5000psi bank is used to fill a 119 from 3000 to 3442?
If they are 5000 PSI storage bottles, then they are probably 480 cf capacity. If so, then the amount of pressure loss is pretty easy to calculate. You will add about 15 cf to the 119 to bring it from 3000 PSI to 3442 PSI. Based on straight PV calculations, that translates to about 150 PSI drop in
one cascade bottle.
Unfortunately, things are not as simple as that, for a couple of reasons.
First we have the issue of non-linearities in the gas compressibility curve. When you start getting up past 3500 PSI or so, then van der Waals effects start to come into play, and you don't get as much gas for the same increase in pressure. What that means is adding 500 PSI into a tank at 4500 PSI will result in LESS gas being added, as compared to adding 500 PSI into a tank at 3000 PSI. The reverse is also true, so your 15 cf of gas will actually create a larger pressure drop than what is predicted by the Ideal Gas Law (which was about 150 PSI, as calculated above). This has the effect of killing pressure in your cascade system
faster, until you get it down to 3500 PSI or so.
The other thing to consider is how a cascade system is actually used. I don't know how much experience you have filling your own tanks, but it is very rare for all the storage bottles to be completely full. Bottles are typically used in a sequence, starting with the bottle that has the lowest pressure (or more accurately, the lowest pressure that is higher than what's currently in the tank being filled). You open and then close each cascade bottle in turn, which increases the pressure in the fill bottle by just a little bit, until you are able to get it up to rated pressure with the last bottle. After some number of fills, you can no longer do that, and then you run the compressor to fill everything back up.
The key to making the cascade system work is keeping the pressure in the last bottle as high as possible. Once that drops below 3000 PSI, it doesn't matter how much pressure you have in the remaining bottles - if you can't get the desired pressure out of the last bottle, then you have to run the compressor. So if you have people bringing in high pressure, high volume tanks to be filled, then that effectively kills the pressure in that last bottle, which forces you to run the compressor more (which kind of defeats the purpose of having a cascade system to begin with).
The whole point of using a cascade system is to avoid having to run the compressor so often. I'd say that a 3-bottle cascade is kind of small for a shop, and I can sort of understand their reluctance to do higher pressure, high volume fills. As you stated, the owner mainly has the fill station to support his own training activities (which is true of most shops), and I'm guessing he has sized his compressor and storage banks according to his needs for his classes. Asking for fills that are somewhat in line with what the system was designed for probably doesn't cause any problems. Higher capacity fills have the effect of skewing the economics, which is why he is charging more for them.
paulwall:
In fact the owner compelled me to upgrade my LP95's burst disks so that he could put 3000psi in them (he routinely overshoots that on a fast fill, I've walked out with 3800psi on an LP95).
Did you mean 2800 PSI? 3800 PSI is not exactly what I would call an "overshoot".
paulwall:
The funniest? thing is that they didn't say boo about filling my 2 PST HP80's. I think Mike is more on-track than you're giving him credit for.
I don't have all the details on the situation, and I'm not really trying to defend or support the owner's price structure - only he can do that. What I
am trying to do is explain some of the issues so that you will perhaps have a better understanding of the economics of the situation. In most cases, a low volume, high pressure fill (or a high volume, low pressure fill) is not as big a concern - it's the high pressure high volume fills that cause the problems. That is why shop owners tend to charge more for those.
paulwall:
But to arbitrarily tell me it will cost 2x as much to fill my HP tank an extra 442 psi doesn't sit square with me.
If you feel the price is too high, then you can always invest in your own compressor. That way you can fill as much or as often as you like.