Cappy,
When the dot.com economy tanked, followed by later bank collapses, companies needed to be especially well run. One of Nekton's selling points was 'US Flag' for some people; obviously from what you shared in your recollections this had an enormous cost. When the economy starts to tank, good business people adjust. Most of Nekton's new itineraries were taking them out of the US. Even the puerto Rico trip crossed international waters and we all needed our passports to re-enter PR. It seems to me that in additon to diluting thire customer base, they also had WAY more fixed costs.
By the way the mechanic had mostly a full time job on the Rorqual. He took me around and explained the mechanical systems on board, he also discussed with me the inherent design flaws that kept the boat moldy. When the generator acted up on the aggressor, the captain fixed it in about 30 minutes; the Nekton had a full time mechanic who had to have very specialized skills.
My point is that the Nekton probably should have re-evaluated EVERYTHING when they started to have cash issues. They could have dropped the US flag, they could have sold a boat, they could have found a different crew profile (part of dropping the US flag)
I am an internet person and I always found their web site to be very funny. I sent it to some of my friends and asked them what they thought this company did. Most thought it was a boat builder of SWARTH technology; only a few realized it was a live-aboard. This was obviously not a strength.
Good business leaders have the guts to stop a business before it cycles down the drain and don't have to steal future reciepts to pay current bills; so when you fail this way you hurt innocent customers the most.
Your point is well taken. There were enormous costs to carrying a US Flag. In addition to the financial costs, after 911 there were also huge logistical considerations involving security, crew training, and paperwork. Running out of Port Everglades for the Bahamas itineraries got much more expensive because of increased port security.
Nekton could have dropped their US Flag, moved to a different base of operations (Blackbeard's moved from Watson Island in Miami to Nassau shortly after 911) and cut costs considerably. The question is, how would it affect the customer base? I know many Nekton guests who went out specifically because the boats left from Ft. Lauderdale. It was cheap for the guests to fly into Lauderdale and hop a boat to the Bahamas. I also know that occupancy rates were always significantly higher when the boats ran out of Ft. Lauderdale (as opposed to Belize, Cayman, and Puerto Rico).
A certain segment of the guests felt reassured that the boats carried the US Flag, because it assured that the crew and boats met USCG regulations--the crew was properly trained and certified by the USCG, the boats had to undergo USCG inspection annually, night watches were required (to me this is basic maritime safety, but other liveaboards that I have been on let the crew sleep through the night). I believe that they kept the flag because it symbolized safety and that appealed to a large segment of the diving public. In that respect, it was a business decision. It might not have been the correct decision based on economic factors, but it certainly emphasized dedication to safety.
The consensus of most posters who have been on the boat the last few years is that the boats were not well maintained. I shudder to think what may have happened had the company reflagged and not had the oversight of the USCG.