Testudo
Contributor
.I was not referring to your post since I did not quote it. I just happened to post after your post. Maybe I should have directed my response to the OP better.
Whenever the discussion of snorkels comes up with SCUBA divers and freedivers, there are those that have been snorkeling since 4-5 years old that say use a simple J-tube because that is all we had back then. There are also those that may toss around the term "gimmick" quite a bit. I also see this with discussions on mask purge valves.
As with any piece of equipment, it is what works best and is most comfortable for the user, so they can spend an enjoyable time on the water.
Best Wishes!
Charles
No worries, didn't notice the other mention of "gimmick" earlier. I would agree that purge valves on snorkels are a product improvement and not a gimmick (if designed to high degree of quality). Not sold on mask purge valve value. However, I would label the various "dry" devices I've tried as being gimmicks. Flapping valves stopping the airflow at unexpected times is not what I call an improvement. Seems like most posters have a universal appreciation for the Tusa line in whichever design. Your last sentence sums up what matters most.
EDIT: To clarify, IMO purge valves on snorkels are useful for surface snorkeling (not commenting on freediving) to easily clear any water that that waves, chop or an occasional dive introduce to the chamber compared to a J-tube type snorkel (not that they are hard to clear).
Last edited: