Read what was written. AS related to accuracy is the key part here.
If a person finds themself in a situation where they are unable to fire accuratly, they should take a covered position, calm down, regain their composure, and then fire accuratly. There is never any excuse for firing a shot that may not be accurate. All that is doing is endangering lives.
To answer your question; yes, and each experience was different. Ranging from military to LE. I am also one of the people that investigated and debriefed such things.
Although YOUR individual experience may be that YOU as an individual are disciplined enough to respond as trained not everyone is.
For example, this SWAT team.
I'm not a robot. I'm a person who received very good training and then stuck to it when the situation called for it. Had I not done so I would expect my superiors to not defend my actions. People make mistakes. Just because the people who make those mistakes are wearing a uniform doesn't mean they shouldn't be held accountable for their actions. If you're carrying a firearm and have the authority to use that firearm in a public setting you should be held to the highest standard possible when it comes to the use of that weapon.
Unless your individual experiences are universal they have no place in training or debriefing except as atypical anecdotal parables.
As to the need to put 68 rounds into a person I again would suggest the FBI study of the Miami shootout, they will make it available to local departments if asked. I would also refer you to the multiple studies conducted by BCJS as related to police shootings.
That was a different situation in which the individual was firing at the officers involved. Again, I see no mention in this Florida case of the suspect firing at the SWAT team.
By the way, your "honest question" is a logical fallacy called "appeal to authority" in which one attempts to establish the supremacy of one's position via establishing oneself as an authority in a subject thus denigrating another's position....
Actually, my honest question was not in any way an appeal to authority. It was an honest question as I didn't feel you did enough in your first post to establish your ethos. I wanted to make sure I was talking to someone who actually knew what they were talking about based upon experience rather than what they have read in a book.
What you're doing now though is getting dangerously close to what is called "talking down to people" and I usually don't take to kindly to that.
