there are no "Master Divers" and never will be.
This makes sense. Captain Obvious?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
there are no "Master Divers" and never will be.
The word "master" has been watered down and many realize that certification does not quite hold the merit that it may have in the past. It is a shame.
Certainly it is. And it's all about a semantic niggle.
Who cares what training is called? Seriously. Does it harm you in any way?
..............
If I were to not have any knowledge of diving and someone were to tell me they were a "Master Diver" immediately, I would envision someone with years of diving experience and training, not someone who may have a year or two, or less under his/her belt and a couple of classes or passed a course after they got 50 dives.
.....................
In the PADI system, the MSD rating is the pinnacle of non-professional, non-technical diving. That's a fair claim....it is exactly that.
Actually, it may serve a point. The title 'sounds cool' and likely appeals to a substantial number of recreational divers, encouraging them to go through a range of certifications to attain it, at the end of which while for the most part not world class cutting edge experts, they will probably still be better divers than had they stopped with OW...If a 'Master Diver' certification lures & encourages more people to take Rescue Diver, then who cares if it has a 'lofty' title? I don't care if they call them 'Jedi Divers,' or 'Scuba Lords.' Not if it encourages more extensive training, making divers better than they'd otherwise be.
Richard.
Which is true in a training sense and where I think PADI and other agencies fall short (except two). There seems to be no ongoing component wherein one can practice and refine ones newly gained knowledge.
People, honestly wanting to become better divers yet lacking the length of time to develop mentor and fellow diver relationships, take course after course and become MSD's or DM's and even instructors before they are really ready to assume the responsability that comes with the title (in the case of the latter two).
Isn't that sad. What does it say about the state of todays diver when we think we have to trick people and ego stroke them into gaining an education. Is a deluded diver a better diver?
Ever been a boy scout? They have badges too. So do the military.
Do military medals represent trickery and delusion? Or something to aspire to?
Actually, it may serve a point. The title 'sounds cool' and likely appeals to a substantial number of recreational divers, encouraging them to go through a range of certifications to attain it, at the end of which while for the most part not world class cutting edge experts, they will probably still be better divers than had they stopped with OW.
Look at the rescue certification, for example, which is required to obtain MSD. I imagine a lot of people would, at first glance, shy away from it, perhaps not being the Type A or highly conscientious sorts who wish/feel compelled to intervene in emergencies. It can be rather liberating to be unable to help in an emergency. But Rescue is perhaps the most well-spoken of cert. on this forum, particularly for enhancing peoples' dive skill level & self-rescue capability. Plus, they're more likely to rescue a buddy in a crisis. Maybe even somebody else, if so inclined.
If a 'Master Diver' certification lures & encourages more people to take Rescue Diver, then who cares if it has a 'lofty' title? I don't care if they call them 'Jedi Divers,' or 'Scuba Lords.' Not if it encourages more extensive training, making divers better than they'd otherwise be.
Richard.